Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014;43(2):256-69.
doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.859081. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Family voice with informed choice: coordinating wraparound with research-based treatment for children and adolescents

Affiliations
Review

Family voice with informed choice: coordinating wraparound with research-based treatment for children and adolescents

Eric J Bruns et al. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014.

Abstract

The wraparound process is a type of individualized, team-based care coordination that has become central to many state and system efforts to reform children's mental health service delivery for youths with the most complex needs and their families. Although the emerging wraparound research base is generally positive regarding placements and costs, effect sizes are smaller for clinical and functional outcomes. This article presents a review of literature on care coordination and wraparound models, with a focus on theory and research that indicates the need to better connect wraparound-enrolled children and adolescents to evidence-based treatment (EBT). The article goes on to describe how recently developed applications of EBT that are based on quality improvement and flexible application of "common elements" of research-based care may provide a more individualized approach that better aligns with the philosophy and procedures of the wraparound process. Finally, this article presents preliminary studies that show the feasibility and potential effectiveness of coordinating wraparound with the Managing and Adapting Practice system, and discusses intervention development and research options that are currently under way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for an enhanced wraparound care coordination model, with enhancements from the Managing and Adapting Practice (MAP) system in italics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Au M, Simon S, Chen A, Lipson D, Gimm G, Rich E. Comparative Effectiveness of Care Coordination for Adults with Disabilities. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2011. Research Brief.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191–215. - PubMed
    1. Barrera MJ. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models I. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1986;14:413–445.
    1. Barth RP. Institutions vs. foster homes: The empirical base for a century of action. Chapel Hill, NC: School of Social Work, Jordan Institute for Families; 2002.
    1. Barth RP, Greeson JK, Zlotnik SR, Chintapalli LK. Evidence-based practice for youth in supervised out-of-home care: A framework for development, definition, and evaluation. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work. 2011;8(5):1–28. - PubMed