Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 24326013
- PMCID: PMC4384958
- DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-25
Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the mean durability and the failure rates of two types of orthodontic retainers.
Methods: Orthodontic patients (142) aged between 14 and 28 years were recruited in this study. The polyethylene woven ribbon (Ribbond, Seattle, WA, USA) retainer was compared with a 0.0175-in flexible spiral wire (Respond, Ormco, Glendora, CA, USA) retainer. When treatment was completed, the retainers were bonded from canine to canine in the maxillary and the mandibular arches of the participants. In the follow-up visits, the patients were re-evaluated every 3 months over a period of 18 months. The time taken for the retainers to remain without any fracture was appraised. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the logrank test were employed to identify significant differences in the survival functions between the groups. The rates of the retainers' failure between the groups were analyzed using Chi-square test.
Results: It was revealed that the mean survival of the flexible spiral wire retainer was 15.34±0.47 and 15.60±0.42 months in the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. The mean survival of the ribbon retainer was 13.95±0.55 and 14.26±0.57 months in the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. Ribbon retainers showed a failure rate of 50% in the maxillary and 42.6% in the mandibular arches. Flexible spiral retainers showed a failure rate of 36.5% in the maxillary and 37.8% in the mandibular arches. The differences were not statistically significant. Regarding the evaluation period, the differences had limited clinical significance.
Conclusion: The mean survival time and the failure rates of the polyethylene woven ribbon retainer were comparable to the flexible spiral wire retainer during the 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.Quintessence Int. 2002 Sep;33(8):579-83. Quintessence Int. 2002. PMID: 12238688 Clinical Trial.
-
"Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01167-7. BMC Oral Health. 2020. PMID: 32600325 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):381-90. J Adhes Dent. 2009. PMID: 19841765 Clinical Trial.
-
Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5):cjae040. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae040. Eur J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 39177154
-
Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Aug;108(2):207-13. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70085-4. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7625397 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical factors affecting the longevity of fixed retainers and the influence of fixed retainers on periodontal health in periodontitis patients: a retrospective study.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Jun;51(3):163-178. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2003140157. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34114380 Free PMC article.
-
"Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study.BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03010-1. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37161557 Free PMC article.
-
Survival rates of mandibular fixed retainers: comparison of a tube-type retainer and conventional multistrand retainers : A prospective randomized clinical trial.J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Sep;85(5):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00447-5. Epub 2023 Feb 27. J Orofac Orthop. 2024. PMID: 36847790 Clinical Trial. English.
-
The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0137-x. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Prog Orthod. 2016. PMID: 27459974 Free PMC article.
-
Universal Adhesive for Fixed Retainer Bonding: In Vitro Evaluation and Randomized Clinical Trial.Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;14(6):1341. doi: 10.3390/ma14061341. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33802135 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Uhde MD, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Long-term stability of dental relationships after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1983;53:240–52. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical