Primary stability of two uncementedacetabular components of different geometry: hemispherical or peripherallyenhanced?
- PMID: 24326398
- PMCID: PMC3860168
- DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.212.2000193
Primary stability of two uncementedacetabular components of different geometry: hemispherical or peripherallyenhanced?
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the primary stability of two commercially available acetabular components from the same manufacturer, which differ only in geometry; a hemispherical and a peripherally enhanced design (peripheral self-locking (PSL)). The objective was to determine whether altered geometry resulted in better primary stability.
Methods: Acetabular components were seated with 0.8 mm to 2 mm interference fits in reamed polyethylene bone substrate of two different densities (0.22 g/cm(3) and 0.45 g/cm(3)). The primary stability of each component design was investigated by measuring the peak failure load during uniaxial pull-out and tangential lever-out tests.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in seating force (p = 0.104) or primary stability (pull-out p = 0.171, lever-out p = 0.087) of the two components in the low-density substrate. Similarly, in the high-density substrate, there was no statistically significant difference in the peak pull-out force (p = 0.154) or lever-out moment (p = 0.574) between the designs. However, the PSL component required a significantly higher seating force than the hemispherical cup in the high-density bone analogue (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: Higher seating forces associated with the PSL design may result in inadequate seating and increased risk of component malpositioning or acetabular fracture in the intra-operative setting in high-density bone stock. Our results, if translated clinically, suggest that a purely hemispherical geometry may have an advantage over a peripherally enhanced geometry in high density bone stock. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:264-9.
Keywords: Acetabular cup; Geometry; Peripherally enhanced; Primary stability; THR; Uncemented.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 9th Annual Report 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 4 October 2012).
-
- Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, MacNab J. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973;7:301–311 - PubMed
-
- Morscher E, Masar Z. Development and first experience with an uncemented press-fit cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;232:96–103 - PubMed
-
- Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;208:108–113 - PubMed
-
- Søballe K, Hansen ES, B-Rasmussen H, Jørgensen PH, Bünger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992;10:285–299 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
