Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation
- PMID: 24328596
- DOI: 10.2217/whe.13.49
Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation
Abstract
Labor induction and cervical ripening are widely utilized and new methods are constantly being investigated. Prostaglandins have been shown to be effective labor induction agents and, in particular, were compared with other prostaglandin preparations; vaginal misoprostol used off-label was associated with reduced failure to achieve vaginal delivery. The challenge is to provide this medication with the correct dosing for this indication and with the ability to discontinue the medication if needed, all while ensuring essential maternal and neonatal safety. The misoprostol vaginal insert initiates cervical ripening using a delivery system that controls misoprostol release and can be rapidly removed. This article reviews the development, safety and efficacy of the misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor and cervical ripening, and will focus on vaginally administered prostaglandins.
Similar articles
-
A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Apr 22;9:2321-7. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S64227. eCollection 2015. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015. PMID: 25960635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):612-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70154-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9322632 Clinical Trial.
-
Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.072. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16157114 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19034471 Clinical Trial.
-
Misoprostol for induction of labor.Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):459-62. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.008. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26601733 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07592-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40259229 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 30621614 Free PMC article.
-
Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):464. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040464. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33919898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources