Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 24330006
- DOI: 10.1111/jth.12485
Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: New direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) constitute a novel treatment option for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), with practical advantages. Individual studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and have suggested a more favorable safety profile . We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NOACs as compared with those of VKAs in patients with acute VTE.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Clinical Trials Registry up to October 2013. Eligible studies included phase 3 trials comparing NOACs with VKAs in patients with acute VTE. Relative risks (RRs), absolute risk differences and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to prevent one event were calculated for recurrent VTE, fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), overall mortality, major bleeding, and other bleeding complications, with random-effects models.
Results: Five studies were included, investigating four NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) in 24 455 patients with acute VTE. RRs for recurrent VTE, fatal PE and overall mortality for NOACs vs. VKAs were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.05), 1.02 (95% CI 0.39-5.96), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.83-1.14), respectively. The RR for major bleeding was 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.88). The NNT with NOACs instead of VKA to prevent one major bleed was 149. The RR and NNT for fatal bleeding were 0.36 (95% CI 0.15-0.87) and 1111. A fixed-effect network analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between individual NOACs and rivaroxaban.
Conclusions: NOACs have comparable efficacy to that of VKAs, and are associated with a significantly lower risk of bleeding complications, although the NNT to prevent one major bleed was relatively high.
Keywords: anticoagulants; hemorrhage; safety; treatment outcome; venous thromboembolism.
© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Similar articles
-
Editor's Choice - efficacy and safety of the new oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III trials.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;48(5):565-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 18. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24951377
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1456-1478.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Clin Ther. 2017. PMID: 28668628
-
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 24;2(2):CD013745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013745.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39991882
-
Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Res. 2014 Oct;134(4):774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jul 6. Thromb Res. 2014. PMID: 25037495
-
Comparison of the Novel Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban in the Initial and Long-Term Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0144856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144856. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26716830 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
New oral anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: are they safer than vitamin K antagonists? A meta-analysis of the interventional trials.Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;10(4):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1171-7. Epub 2014 Dec 25. Intern Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25539954
-
Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis.Blood Adv. 2021 Mar 9;5(5):1369-1378. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003849. Blood Adv. 2021. PMID: 33661297 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of deep venous thrombosis management and associated factors among patients in tertiary hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Thromb J. 2024 Jul 12;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00627-2. Thromb J. 2024. PMID: 38997721 Free PMC article.
-
Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):251. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010251. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202258 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Apixaban: A Review in Venous Thromboembolism.Drugs. 2016 Oct;76(15):1493-1504. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0644-6. Drugs. 2016. PMID: 27653758 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical