180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial--the GOLIATH study
- PMID: 24331152
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040
180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial--the GOLIATH study
Abstract
Background: The comparative outcome with GreenLight (GL) photoselective vaporisation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been questioned.
Objective: The primary objective of the GOLIATH study was to evaluate the noninferiority of 180-W GL XPS (XPS) to TURP for International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) at 6 mo and the proportion of patients who were complication free.
Design, setting, and participants: Prospective randomised controlled trial at 29 centres in 9 European countries involving 281 patients with BPO.
Intervention: 180-W GL XPS system or TURP.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Measurements used were IPSS, Qmax, prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR) and complications, perioperative parameters, and reintervention rates. Noninferiority was evaluated using one-sided tests at the 2.5% level of significance. The statistical significance of other comparisons was assessed at the (two-sided) 5% level.
Results and limitations: The study demonstrated the noninferiority of XPS to TURP for IPSS, Qmax, and complication-free proportion. PV and PVR were comparable between groups. Time until stable health status, length of catheterisation, and length of hospital stay were superior with XPS (p<0.001). Early reintervention rate within 30 d was three times higher after TURP (p=0.025); however, the overall postoperative reintervention rates were not significantly different between treatment arms. A limitation was the short follow-up.
Conclusions: XPS was shown to be noninferior (comparable) to TURP in terms of IPSS, Qmax, and proportion of patients free of complications. XPS results in a lower rate of early reinterventions but has a similar rate after 6 mo.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01218672.
Keywords: Adverse events; Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO); Clavien-Dindo classification; Efficacy; GreenLight XPS 180-W laser; Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP); Safety; TURP; Transurethral surgery.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Comment in
-
BPH: Lasers equal TURP in head-to-head study.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jan;11(1):6. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.288. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 24296708 No abstract available.
-
A plea for higher-quality data for GreenLight laser technology in the context of surgical benign prostatic obstruction trials: the GOLIATH study-fact or fiction in the era of evidence-based urology?Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):943-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.037. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24331150 No abstract available.
-
Reply from authors re: Charalampos Mamoulakis. A plea for higher-quality data for GreenLight laser technology in the context of surgical benign prostatic obstruction trials: the GOLIATH study-fact or fiction in the era of evidence-based urology? Eur Urol 2014;65:943-5.Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):945-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 21. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24388437 No abstract available.
-
Re: 180-W XPS GreenLight Laser Vaporisation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial-the GOLIATH Study.J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):480-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.046. Epub 2015 Apr 15. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26195398 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials