Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;132 Suppl 1(0 1):S33-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Application of the Carolina Framework for Cervical Cancer Prevention

Affiliations

Application of the Carolina Framework for Cervical Cancer Prevention

Jennifer L Moss et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The Carolina Framework for Cervical Cancer Prevention describes 4 main causes of cervical cancer incidence: human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, lack of screening, screening errors, and not receiving follow-up care. We present 2 applications of the Carolina Framework in which we identify high-need counties in North Carolina and generate recommendations for improving prevention efforts.

Methods: We created a cervical cancer prevention need index (CCPNI) that ranked counties on cervical cancer mortality, HPV vaccine initiation and completion, Pap smear screening, and provision of Pap tests to rarely- or never-screened women. In addition, we conducted in-depth interviews with 19 key informants from programs and agencies involved in cervical cancer prevention in North Carolina.

Results: North Carolina's 100 counties varied widely on individual CCPNI components, including annual cervical cancer mortality (median 2.7/100,000 women; range 0.0-8.0), adolescent girls' HPV vaccine initiation (median 42%; range 15%-62%), and Pap testing in the previous 3 years among Medicaid-insured adult women (median 59%; range 40%-83%). Counties with the greatest prevention needs formed 2 distinct clusters in the northeast and south-central regions of the state. Interviews generated 9 recommendations to improve cervical cancer prevention in North Carolina, identifying applications to specific programs and policies in the state.

Conclusions: This study found striking geographic disparities in cervical cancer prevention need in North Carolina. Future prevention efforts in the state should prioritize high-need regions as well as recommended strategies and applications in existing programs. Other states can use the Carolina Framework to increase the impact of their cervical cancer prevention efforts.

Keywords: Cancer prevention; Cervical cancer; Health disparities; Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine; Pap test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

NB has received grants or served on paid advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
North Carolina counties with high cervical cancer prevention need scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grauman DJ, Tarone RE, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF., Jr Alternate ranging methods for cancer mortality maps. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(7):534–543. - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008. 2011
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer, topic page. [Accessed November 7, 2013.];Updated 2012.
    1. Denslow SA, Knop G, Klaus C, Brewer NT, Rao C, Smith JS. Burden of invasive cervical cancer in North Carolina. Prev Med. 2012;54(3–4):270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.01.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downs LS, Smith JS, Scarinci I, Flowers L, Parham G. The disparity of cervical cancer in diverse populations. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2 Suppl):S22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances