Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk lateral bending: in vivo three-dimensional analysis
- PMID: 24333460
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.054
Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk lateral bending: in vivo three-dimensional analysis
Abstract
Background context: In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk lateral bending with an intact rib cage and soft tissues has not been well documented. There is no quantitative data in the literature for lateral bending in consecutive thoracic spinal segments, and there has not been consensus on the patterns of coupled motion with lateral bending.
Purpose: To demonstrate segmental ranges of motion (ROMs) in lateral bending and coupled motions of the thoracic spine.
Study design: In vivo three-dimensional biomechanics study of the thoracic spine.
Patient sample: Fifteen healthy male volunteers.
Outcome measures: Computed analysis by using voxel-based registration.
Methods: Participants underwent computed tomography of the thoracic spine in three supine positions: neutral, right maximum lateral bending, and left maximum lateral bending. The relative motions of vertebrae were calculated by automatically superimposing an image of vertebrae in a neutral position over images in bending positions, using voxel-based registration. Mean values of lateral bending were compared among the upper (T1-T2 to T3-T4), the middle-upper (T4-T5 to T6-T7), the middle-lower (T7-T8 to T9-T10), and the lower (T10-T11 to T12-L1) parts of the spine.
Results: At lateral bending, the mean ROM (±standard deviation) of T1 with respect to L1 was 15.6°±6.3° for lateral bending and 6.2°±4.8° for coupled axial rotation in the same direction as lateral bending. The mean lateral bending of each spinal segment with respect to the inferior adjacent vertebra was 1.4°±1.3° at T1-T2, 1.3°±1.2° at T2-T3, 1.4°±1.3° at T3-T4, 0.9°±0.9° at T4-T5, 0.8°±1.0° at T5-T6, 1.1°±1.1° at T6-T7, 1.7°±1.2° at T7-T8, 1.3°±1.2° at T8-T9, 1.6°±0.7° at T9-T10, 1.8°±0.8° at T10-T11, 2.3°±1.0° at T11-T12, and 2.2°±0.8° at T12-L1. The smallest and the largest amounts of lateral bending were observed in the middle-upper and the lower parts, respectively. There was no significant difference in lateral bending between the upper and the middle-lower parts. Coupled axial rotation of each segment was generally observed in the same direction as lateral bending. However, high variability was found at the T2-T3 to T5-T6 segments. Coupled flexion was observed at the upper and middle parts, and coupled extension was observed at the lower part.
Conclusions: This study revealed in vivo three-dimensional motions of consecutive thoracic spinal segments in trunk lateral bending. The thoracolumbar segments significantly contributed to lateral bending. Coupled axial rotation generally occurred in the same direction with lateral bending. However, more variability was observed in the direction of coupled axial rotation at T2-T3 to T5-T6 segments in the supine position. These results are useful for understanding normal kinematics of the thoracic spine.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Coupled motion; In vivo three-dimensional; Lateral bending; Scoliosis; Thoracic spine.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk rotation: in vivo 3-dimensional analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):E1318-28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318267254b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22772578
-
Thoracic spinal kinematics is affected by the grade of intervertebral disc degeneration, but not by the presence of the ribs: An in vitro study.Spine J. 2020 Mar;20(3):488-498. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31654810
-
The effect of follower load on the intersegmental coupled motion characteristics of the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using entire rib cage specimens.J Biomech. 2018 Sep 10;78:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jul 6. J Biomech. 2018. PMID: 30031651
-
The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults - A systematic review of in vivo studies.J Biomech. 2018 Sep 10;78:21-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 4. J Biomech. 2018. PMID: 30100219
-
Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the kangaroo spine in comparison with human spinal data.J Anat. 2023 Jul;243(1):128-137. doi: 10.1111/joa.13852. Epub 2023 Mar 17. J Anat. 2023. PMID: 36929138 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro coupled motions of the whole human thoracic and lumbar spine with rib cage.JOR Spine. 2023 May 4;6(3):e1257. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1257. eCollection 2023 Sep. JOR Spine. 2023. PMID: 37780824 Free PMC article.
-
An Enhanced Spine Model Validated for Simulating Dynamic Lifting Tasks in OpenSim.Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Feb;52(2):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03368-x. Epub 2023 Sep 23. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024. PMID: 37741902
-
Fat-Free Mass and the Balance Error Scoring System Predict an Appropriate Maximal Load in the Unilateral Farmer's Walk.Sports (Basel). 2018 Dec 8;6(4):166. doi: 10.3390/sports6040166. Sports (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30544822 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the mechanism and clinical classification of thoracolumbar scoliosis using three-dimensional EOS and surface electromyography.Heliyon. 2023 Aug 26;9(9):e19510. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19510. eCollection 2023 Sep. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37681131 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Musculoskeletal Model of the Fully Articulated Thoracolumbar Spine and Rib Cage.J Biomech Eng. 2015 Aug;137(8):081003. doi: 10.1115/1.4030408. Epub 2015 Jun 9. J Biomech Eng. 2015. PMID: 25901907 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials