Characteristics of urinary tract infection pathogens and their in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in China: data from a multicenter study
- PMID: 24334199
- PMCID: PMC3863131
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004152
Characteristics of urinary tract infection pathogens and their in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in China: data from a multicenter study
Abstract
Objective: This study assessed the characteristics of pathogens identified in clinical isolates from patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) and their in vitro sensitivity to commonly used antibiotics in the clinical setting in China.
Design and setting: Multicenter study was conducted between January and December 2011 in 12 hospitals in China.
Participants: Urine samples were collected from 356 symptomatic patients treated in the study hospitals for acute uncomplicated cystitis, recurrent UTI or complicated UTI.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured using broth microdilution according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2011 guidelines. Thirteen antimicrobial agents were tested: fosfomycin tromethamine, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, cefdinir, cefixime, cefaclor, cefprozil, cefuroxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, azithromycin, nitrofurantoin and oxacillin. Escherichia coli isolates were screened and extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) production was confirmed by a double-disk synergy test.
Results: 198 urine samples were culture-positive and 175 isolates were included in the final analysis. E coli was detected in 50% of cultures, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (9%), Enterococcus faecalis (9%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%). The detection rate of ESBL-producing E coli was 53%. Resistance to levofloxacin was the most common among all the isolates. Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin tromethamine had the greatest activity against E coli; overall, 92% and 91% of isolates were susceptible to these antimicrobials. E faecalis had the highest susceptibility rates to fosfomycin tromethamine (100%).
Conclusions: The most frequently identified pathogens in our patients were ESBL-producing E coli and E faecalis. Fosfomycin tromethamine and nitrofurantoin showed a good antimicrobial activity against UTI pathogens. They may represent good options for the empiric treatment of patients with UTI.
Similar articles
-
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in health care-associated urinary tract infection: focus on susceptibility to fosfomycin.Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jul;47(7):1059-66. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1018-9. Epub 2015 May 31. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26026972
-
In vitro susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains isolated from urine samples obtained in mainland China to fosfomycin trometamol and other antibiotics: a 9-year surveillance study (2004-2012).BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 6;14:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-66. BMC Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24502648 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in a teaching hospital in Taiwan.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011 Oct;44(5):364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2010.08.012. Epub 2011 Jan 20. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011. PMID: 21524974
-
Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14 Suppl 1:198-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01852.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008. PMID: 18154548 Review.
-
An update on the management of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance.Postgrad Med. 2017 Mar;129(2):242-258. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1246055. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Postgrad Med. 2017. PMID: 27712137 Review.
Cited by
-
Fosfomycin, interesting alternative drug for treatment of urinary tract infections created by multiple drug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing strains.Iran J Microbiol. 2016 Apr;8(2):125-31. Iran J Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27307978 Free PMC article.
-
Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Trials for COMparing Personalized Antibiotic StrategieS (SMART-COMPASS).Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;68(11):1961-1967. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy912. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 30351426 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral and dietary risk factors of recurrent urinary tract infection in Chinese postmenopausal women: a case-control study.J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519889448. doi: 10.1177/0300060519889448. Epub 2019 Dec 16. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 31840544 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of perioperative prophylaxis with fosfomycin tromethamine in ureteroscopic stone removal: an investigator-driven prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study.Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Mar;50(3):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1776-7. Epub 2017 Dec 30. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 29290000 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Heteroresistance associated with the production of fosfomycin-resistant inner colonies during disk diffusion testing among a geographically diverse collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Feb 20;7(1):dlaf013. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf013. eCollection 2025 Feb. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025. PMID: 39980626 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stamm WE, Norrby SR. Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. J Infect Dis 2001;183(Suppl 1):S1–4 - PubMed
-
- Foxman B, Barlow R, d'Arcy H, et al. Urinary tract infection: estimated incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10:509–15 - PubMed
-
- Carlson KJ, Mulley AG. Management of acute dysuria: a decision analysis model of alternative strategies. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:244–9 - PubMed
-
- Kunin CM. Urinary tract infections in females. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:1–10 - PubMed
-
- Engel JD, Schaeffer AJ. Evaluation of and antimicrobial therapy for recurrent urinary tract infections in women. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:685–701 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources