Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;73(1):72-80.
doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000028.

Neuropathologic heterogeneity does not impair florbetapir-positron emission tomography postmortem correlates

Affiliations

Neuropathologic heterogeneity does not impair florbetapir-positron emission tomography postmortem correlates

Brittany N Dugger et al. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Neuropathologic heterogeneity is often present among Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. We sought to determine whether amyloid imaging measures of AD are affected by concurrent pathologies. Thirty-eight clinically and pathologically defined AD and 17 nondemented patients with quantitative florbetapir F-18 (F-AV-45) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging during life and postmortem histological β-amyloid quantification and neuropathologic examination were assessed. AD patients were divided on the basis of concurrent pathologies, including those with Lewy bodies (LBs) (n = 21), white matter rarefaction (n = 27), severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy (n = 11), argyrophilic grains (n = 5), and TAR DNA binding protein-43 inclusions (n = 18). Many patients exhibited more than 1 type of concurrent pathology. The ratio of cortical to cerebellar amyloid imaging signal (SUVr) and immunohistochemical β-amyloid load were analyzed in 6 cortical regions of interest. All AD subgroups had strong and significant correlations between SUVr and histological β-amyloid measures (p μ 0.001). All AD subgroups had significantly greater amyloid measures versus nondemented patients, and mean amyloid measures did not significantly differ between AD subgroups. When comparing AD cases with and without each pathology, AD cases with LBs had significantly lower SUVr measures versus AD cases without LBs (p = 0.002); there were no other paired comparison differences. These findings indicate that florbetapir-PET imaging is not confounded by neuropathological heterogeneity within AD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

BND, GES, MM, and LIS have had portions of their salary supported by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a division of Eli Lily. CMC, MJP, APC, ADJ, MAM, and DMS are or were employees of Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a division of Eli Lilly, and formerly held Avid stock or options. TGB has received funding related to the topic of this report from the National Institute on Aging (grant P30 AG19610), Arizona Department of Health Services (contract 211002 awarded to the Arizona Alzheimer’s Research Center), Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare, and GE Healthcare. BJB and SPZ have received compensation and shares from Biospective. REC reports membership of the medical advisory board for GE Healthcare from 2003 to 2008; being a consultant for GE Healthcare from 2003 to 2008; receiving a research grant from GE Healthcare in 2010; receiving funding for a clinical trial from Molecular Insights Pharmaceuticals in 2010; serving on a medical advisory board for Molecular Insights Pharmaceuticals from 2004 to 2009; serving on a medical advisory board and receiving a grant from Avid to support his participation in this study; serving on a medical advisory board and as a consultant to Eli Lilly; and serving on a medical advisory board for Bayer. PMD reports receiving research grants related to this project (awarded to Duke University), currently or previously serving as an adviser to Piramal, Targacept, Abbvie, Danone, Cognoptix, Baxter, Forest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Medivation, Pfizer, Elan, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Neuroptix, Neuronetrix, Sonexa, Accera, TauRx, Myriad, National Institute on Aging, AstraZeneca, Labopharm, Clarimedix, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Alzheimer’s Association, Alzheimer’s Foundation, Rutgers University, and the University of California; owning stock in Sonexa and Clarimedix; and receiving a grant from Avid (awarded to Duke University) for his participation in this study. ASF has served as a consultant to Lilly and Avid, and received grant funding from Avid. EMR reports serving as a scientific adviser to Sygnis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Intellect, Link Medicine, Novartis, Siemens, and Takeda; having had research contracts with National Institute on Aging, Arizona Department of Health Services, AstraZeneca and Avid; having patents pending for an imaging strategy for screening treatments for Alzheimer’s disease in laboratory animals, a biomarker strategy for the assessment of presymptomatic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, a statistical strategy for the analysis of complementary complex datasets, and GAB2 testing in clinical assessment of Alzheimer’s disease through TGen, AstraZeneca, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, and Kronos Life Sciences; receiving research grants from the National Institute on Aging, National Institute for Mental Health, an anonymous foundation, Nomis Foundation, Banner Alzheimer’s Foundation, and State of Arizona; holding patents for an imaging strategy for the screening of AD treatments in laboratory animals (active), a biomarker strategy for the assessment of presymptomatic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (pending, through Banner Health), a statistical strategy for the analysis of complementary complex data sets (pending, through Banner Health), and GAB2 testing in clinical assessment of Alzheimer’s disease (pending, through Translational Genomics Research Institute); and serving as the executive director for the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute and the director of the Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium. MNS reports serving in a consulting or advisory capacity for Eli Lilly, Amerisciences, Takeda, Eisai, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline; receiving royalties from Wiley, FT Pearson Press, and Amerisciences; and receiving contracts and grants from Celgene, Ceregene, Bayer, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GE Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Wyeth, Janssen, Elan, Avid, Genentech, Medivation, and Eisai. CHS reports serving on speaker bureaus for Novartis, Forest, and Accera, and as a consultant to Novartis and Eli Lilly. JAS reports being a consultant for Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and serving in an advisory capacity for Eli Lilly and GE Healthcare receiving compensation for services.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of severity scores given to plaque densities (top) and white matter rarefaction (WMR- bottom). Top: 80 µm sections of the superior frontal gyrus stained with the Campbell Switzer enhanced silver stain -from left to right: 0 - none, 1 - mild, 2 - moderate, and 3 - frequent plaque densities. Bottom: macro view of 80 µm sections of the frontal lobe stained with hematoxylin and eosin, WMR was scored as from left to right: 0 - none, 1 - mild, 2 - moderate, and 3 - severe. In this study, a case was defined as having significant WMR if it had a score of 2 or higher in one or more of the following lobes: frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measures of average cortical amyloid load in AD subgroups with different concurrent pathologies. Left: Graphs demonstrating the variability of in vivo amyloid imaging measures for average cortical amyloid load, using the mean standard uptake value ratios (SUVr) for each AD subgroup. The thick black line on all graphs represents the mean of all AD cases, while the dashed and lighter lines represent one and two standard deviations from the mean, respectively. The red line at an SUVr value of 1.1. represents an adopted SUVr cut off between amyloid positive and negative (32). The x-axis numbers are the individual case numbers as listed in Table 2. Right: photos taken at 10× of the respective pathologies. Panel A: AD with white matter rarefaction (WMR) – photo from an 80 µm section of parietal cortex white matter stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Panel B: AD with Lewy bodies (LBs-grey circles indicate clinicopathological diagnosis of DLB), photo from a 5 µm paraffin amygdala section stained immunohistochemically for phosphorylated α-synuclein (black) and counterstained with Neutral Red. Panel C: AD with argyrophilic grains (Arg), photo from an 80 µm section of amygdala stained with the Gallyas silver method. Panel D: AD with TDP-43 inclusions (white diamond indicates case with a clinicopathological diagnosis of FTLD-TDP-43 in addition to AD) ; photo taken from a 40 µm section of middle frontal gyrus that was immunohistochemically stained for phosphorylated TDP-43 (black) and counterstained with Neutral Red. Panel E: AD with severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA); photo from an 80 µm Thioflavin-S stained section of frontal cortex.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box plots of median, 25th and 75th percentile of in vivo amyloid imaging measures for average cortical amyloid load of Alzheimer’s disease cases using the standard uptake value ratios (SUVr) in subjects with presence (gray boxes) or absence (white boxes) of concurrent pathologies: (CAA; with N = 11; without N = 27), TDP-43 (with N = 18; without N = 20), LBs (with n = 21, without N = 17), WMR (with N = 27, without N = 11), and Arg (with N = 5, without N = 33). Whiskers above and below the box indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles. Utilizing the Mann-Whitney U-test, the only significantly different pairwise comparison was that comparing AD subjects with and without LBs (p = 0.002).

References

    1. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Annals of neurology. 2004;55:306–319. - PubMed
    1. Wong DF, Rosenberg PB, Zhou Y, et al. In vivo imaging of amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease using the radioligand 18F-AV-45 (florbetapir [corrected] F 18) Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2010;51:913–920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trojanowski JQ, Vandeerstichele H, Korecka M, et al. Update on the biomarker core of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2010;6:230–238. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Small GW, Kepe V, Ercoli LM, et al. PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355:2652–2663. - PubMed
    1. Rowe CC, Ackerman U, Browne W, et al. Imaging of amyloid beta in Alzheimer's disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet neurology. 2008;7:129–135. - PubMed

Publication types