Rigorous approaches to species delimitation have significant implications for African crocodilian systematics and conservation
- PMID: 24335982
- PMCID: PMC3871313
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2483
Rigorous approaches to species delimitation have significant implications for African crocodilian systematics and conservation
Abstract
Accurate species delimitation is a central assumption of biology that, in groups such as the Crocodylia, is often hindered by highly conserved morphology and frequent introgression. In Africa, crocodilian systematics has been hampered by complex regional biogeography and confounded taxonomic history. We used rigorous molecular and morphological species delimitation methods to test the hypothesis that the slender-snouted crocodile (Mecistops cataphractus) is composed of multiple species corresponding to the Congolian and Guinean biogeographic zones. Speciation probability was assessed by using 11 mitochondrial and nuclear genes, and cranial morphology for over 100 specimens, representing the full geographical extent of the species distribution. Molecular Bayesian and phylogenetic species delimitation showed unanimous support for two Mecistops species isolated to the Upper Guinean and Congo (including Lower Guinean) biomes that were supported by 13 cranial characters capable of unambiguously diagnosing each species. Fossil-calibrated phylogenetic reconstruction estimated that the species split ± 6.5-7.5 Ma, which is congruent with intraspecies divergence within the sympatric crocodile genus Osteolaemus and the formation of the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Our results underscore the necessity of comprehensive phylogeographic analyses within currently recognized taxa to detect cryptic species within the Crocodylia. We recommend that the community of crocodilian researchers reconsider the conceptualization of crocodilian species especially in the light of the conservation ramifications for this economically and ecologically important group.
Keywords: African biogeography; Mecistops; Osteolaemus; phylogeography; speciation probability.
Figures
References
-
- Wheeler QD, Meier R. 2000. Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate. New York, NY: Columbia University Press
-
- de Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56, 879–886 (doi:10.1080/10635150701701083) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Simpson GG. 1951. The species concept. Evolution 5, 285–298 (doi:10.2307/2405675) - DOI
-
- Wiley EO. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27, 17–26 (doi:10.2307/2412809) - DOI
-
- Agapow P-M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Crandall KA, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Marshall JC, Purvis A. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 161–179 (doi:10.1086/383542) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources