Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 11;281(1776):20132683.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2683. Print 2014 Feb 7.

The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise

Affiliations

The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise

Erica L Morley et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is now recognized as a major global pollutant. Rapidly burgeoning research has identified impacts on individual behaviour and physiology through to community disruption. To date, however, there has been an almost exclusive focus on vertebrates. Not only does their central role in food webs and in fulfilling ecosystem services make imperative our understanding of how invertebrates are impacted by all aspects of environmental change, but also many of their inherent characteristics provide opportunities to overcome common issues with the current anthropogenic noise literature. Here, we begin by explaining why invertebrates are likely to be affected by anthropogenic noise, briefly reviewing their capacity for hearing and providing evidence that they are capable of evolutionary adaptation and behavioural plasticity in response to natural noise sources. We then discuss the importance of quantifying accurately and fully both auditory ability and noise content, emphasizing considerations of direct relevance to how invertebrates detect sounds. We showcase how studying invertebrates can help with the behavioural bias in the literature, the difficulties in drawing strong, ecologically valid conclusions and the need for studies on fitness impacts. Finally, we suggest avenues of future research using invertebrates that would advance our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise.

Keywords: environmental change; fitness; hearing; insect; noise quantification; pollution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Approximate hearing ranges of insect orders and noise spectrum of road traffic recorded at 15 m. Noise spectra taken from Schaub et al. [28]. Asterisk indicates that species sensitive to particle velocity are also included.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM. 2010. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 180–189 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watts RD, Compton RW, McCammon JH, Rich CL, Wright SM, Owens T, Ouren DS. 2007. Roadless space of the conterminous United States. Science 316, 736–738 (doi:10.1126/science.1138141) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN. 2010. A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 419–427 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hildebrand J. 2009. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 395, 5–20 (doi:10.3354/meps08353) - DOI
    1. Le Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Popper AN. (eds) 2012. Noise-induced hearing loss: scientific advances. New York, NY: Springer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources