The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise
- PMID: 24335986
- PMCID: PMC3871318
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2683
The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise is now recognized as a major global pollutant. Rapidly burgeoning research has identified impacts on individual behaviour and physiology through to community disruption. To date, however, there has been an almost exclusive focus on vertebrates. Not only does their central role in food webs and in fulfilling ecosystem services make imperative our understanding of how invertebrates are impacted by all aspects of environmental change, but also many of their inherent characteristics provide opportunities to overcome common issues with the current anthropogenic noise literature. Here, we begin by explaining why invertebrates are likely to be affected by anthropogenic noise, briefly reviewing their capacity for hearing and providing evidence that they are capable of evolutionary adaptation and behavioural plasticity in response to natural noise sources. We then discuss the importance of quantifying accurately and fully both auditory ability and noise content, emphasizing considerations of direct relevance to how invertebrates detect sounds. We showcase how studying invertebrates can help with the behavioural bias in the literature, the difficulties in drawing strong, ecologically valid conclusions and the need for studies on fitness impacts. Finally, we suggest avenues of future research using invertebrates that would advance our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise.
Keywords: environmental change; fitness; hearing; insect; noise quantification; pollution.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836):20160839. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0839. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27534952 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anthropogenic noise and the bioacoustics of terrestrial invertebrates.J Exp Biol. 2019 Jun 19;222(Pt 12):jeb178749. doi: 10.1242/jeb.178749. J Exp Biol. 2019. PMID: 31217253 Review.
-
Marine and Freshwater Sounds Impact Invertebrate Behavior and Physiology: A Meta-Analysis.Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Nov;30(11):e17593. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17593. Glob Chang Biol. 2024. PMID: 39582363 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise.Conserv Biol. 2021 Feb;35(1):115-129. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13510. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Conserv Biol. 2021. PMID: 32277776
-
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Nov;91(4):982-1005. doi: 10.1111/brv.12207. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016. PMID: 26118691 Review.
Cited by
-
European mammal exposure to lead from ammunition and fishing weight sources.Heliyon. 2022 Aug 12;8(8):e10014. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10014. eCollection 2022 Aug. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 36051261 Free PMC article.
-
Repeated exposure reduces the response to impulsive noise in European seabass.Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3349-60. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13352. Epub 2016 Jun 10. Glob Chang Biol. 2016. PMID: 27282635 Free PMC article.
-
A global meta-analysis reveals contrasting impacts of air, light, and noise pollution on pollination.Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e9990. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9990. eCollection 2023 Apr. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37082326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Traffic noise exposure impacts song production in wild male field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) under predator and intrasexual competition contexts.R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 7;12(5):241346. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241346. eCollection 2025 May. R Soc Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40370616 Free PMC article.
-
Are giant clams (Tridacna maxima) distractible? A multi-modal study.PeerJ. 2020 Oct 5;8:e10050. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10050. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 33083126 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM. 2010. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 180–189 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Watts RD, Compton RW, McCammon JH, Rich CL, Wright SM, Owens T, Ouren DS. 2007. Roadless space of the conterminous United States. Science 316, 736–738 (doi:10.1126/science.1138141) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN. 2010. A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 419–427 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hildebrand J. 2009. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 395, 5–20 (doi:10.3354/meps08353) - DOI
-
- Le Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Popper AN. (eds) 2012. Noise-induced hearing loss: scientific advances. New York, NY: Springer
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical