Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes
- PMID: 24336346
- PMCID: PMC4565991
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt203
Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are designed to generate inhalable nicotine aerosol (vapor). When an e-cigarette user takes a puff, the nicotine solution is heated and the vapor is taken into lungs. Although no sidestream vapor is generated between puffs, some of the mainstream vapor is exhaled by e-cigarette user. The aim of this study was to evaluate the secondhand exposure to nicotine and other tobacco-related toxicants from e-cigarettes.
Materials and methods: We measured selected airborne markers of secondhand exposure: nicotine, aerosol particles (PM(2.5)), carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in an exposure chamber. We generated e-cigarette vapor from 3 various brands of e-cigarette using a smoking machine and controlled exposure conditions. We also compared secondhand exposure with e-cigarette vapor and tobacco smoke generated by 5 dual users.
Results: The study showed that e-cigarettes are a source of secondhand exposure to nicotine but not to combustion toxicants. The air concentrations of nicotine emitted by various brands of e-cigarettes ranged from 0.82 to 6.23 µg/m(3). The average concentration of nicotine resulting from smoking tobacco cigarettes was 10 times higher than from e-cigarettes (31.60±6.91 vs. 3.32±2.49 µg/m(3), respectively; p = .0081).
Conclusions: Using an e-cigarette in indoor environments may involuntarily expose nonusers to nicotine but not to toxic tobacco-specific combustion products. More research is needed to evaluate health consequences of secondhand exposure to nicotine, especially among vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant women, and people with cardiovascular conditions.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study.Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0072-x. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015. PMID: 26452675
-
Electronic cigarettes in the indoor environment.Rev Environ Health. 2019 Jun 26;34(2):105-124. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0012. Rev Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 31112510 Review.
-
Nicotine, aerosol particles, carbonyls and volatile organic compounds in tobacco- and menthol-flavored e-cigarettes.Environ Health. 2017 Apr 27;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0249-x. Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28449666 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality.Inhal Toxicol. 2012 Oct;24(12):850-7. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2012.724728. Inhal Toxicol. 2012. PMID: 23033998
-
Air monitoring at large public electronic cigarette events.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Apr;221(3):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 10. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018. PMID: 29477829
Cited by
-
Knowledge About E-Cigarette Constituents and Regulation: Results From a National Survey of U.S. Young Adults.Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1247-54. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu276. Epub 2014 Dec 26. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015. PMID: 25542915 Free PMC article.
-
Has the mist been peered through? Revisiting the building blocks of human health risk assessment for electronic cigarette use.Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2016;22(2):558-579. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1100064. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2016. PMID: 38162291 Free PMC article.
-
Nicotine Exposure in the U.S. Population: Total Urinary Nicotine Biomarkers in NHANES 2015-2016.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 19;19(6):3660. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063660. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35329347 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental Electronic Vape Exposure from Four Different Generations of Electronic Cigarettes: Airborne Particulate Matter Levels.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 3;15(10):2172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102172. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30282910 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic cigarette chemicals transfer from a vape shop to a nearby business in a multiple-tenant retail building.Tob Control. 2019 Sep;28(5):519-525. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054316. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Tob Control. 2019. PMID: 30158206 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bullen C., McRobbie H., Thornley S., Glover M., Lin R., Laugesen M. (2010). Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: Randomised cross-over trial. Tobacco Control, 19, 98–103. 10.1136/tc.2009.031567 - PubMed
-
- California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. (2005). Proposed identification of environmental tobacco smoke as a toxic air contaminant. Part A. Exposure assessment. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency.
-
- Czogala J., Goniewicz M. L. (2005). The complex analytical method for assessment of passive smokers’ exposure to carbon monoxide. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 29, 830–834. 10.1093/jat/29.8.830 - PubMed
-
- Dawkins L., Corcoran O. (2013). Acute electronic cigarette use: Nicotine delivery and subjective effects in regular users. Psychopharmacology (Berl). Advance online publication. 10.1007/s00213-013-3249-8 - PubMed
-
- Etter J. F., Bullen C. (2011). Saliva cotinine levels in users of electronic cigarettes. European Respiratory Journal, 38, 1219–1220. 10.1183/09031936.00066011 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical