Comparison of uptake and predictors of adherence in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in a community-based cardiovascular prevention programme (MyAction Westminster)

Abstract

Background: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation, uptake and adherence remain suboptimal. With the advent of NHS Health Checks, primary prevention programmes have also been advocated, but little is known about uptake and adherence rates. This study examined rates and predictors of adherence amongst patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those at high multifactorial risk (HRI) attending an innovative programme integrating primary and secondary prevention.

Methods: Comparison of rates of uptake and adherence and also predictors of adherence between 401 CVD patients and 483 HRI. The outcome was the number of sessions attended and predictor variables included clinical and psychosocial variables. Differences between groups were examined using t-tests and non-parametric tests. Multivariable regression analyses examined predictors of adherence.

Results: Uptake to the assessment (CVD: 97%, HRI: 88%) and the programme (CVD: 78%, HRI: 74%) were high for both groups. An average of 8/12 was attended in both groups. Beliefs about treatment predicted adherence for both groups (P < 0.01). The alcohol causal belief also predicted poorer adherence amongst CVD patients (P < 0.02). Older age also predicted better adherence amongst HRI (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Rates of uptake and adherence were high for both HRI and CVD patients. Further research is needed to examine whether interventions targeting predictor variables further improve adherence.

Keywords: beliefs; population-based and preventative services; psychological determinants.