Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;23(6):419-23.
doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.120338.

Cyclosporine/ketoconazole reduces treatment costs for nephrotic syndrome

Affiliations

Cyclosporine/ketoconazole reduces treatment costs for nephrotic syndrome

A Iyengar et al. Indian J Nephrol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Cyclosporine A (CyA) is an effective agent for the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (GCDNS), but costs are prohibitive in resource-poor societies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reducing the dose of CyA by co-administering ketoconazole. A prospective study targeting children 2-18 years of age with GCDNS in remission with CyA monotherapy was conducted. CyA dose was reduced by 50% and ketoconazole was added at 25% of the recommended therapeutic dose, and the drug levels and therapeutic and adverse effects (AE) were monitored. Continued combined therapy after completion of the 4-week trial period was offered. Ten patients (median age 9.5 years, range 3.0-16.0 years) were enrolled in the study. At week 4, the CyA dose was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/kg/day compared with 5.6 ± 0.9 mg/kg/day at enrolment (P < 0.0001). No AE were noted. All patients continued ketoconazole treatment for at least 3 months. CyA drug cost savings were 61%, and approximately 60% with ketoconazole cost included. The combination of an expensive immunosuppressive drug with a cheap metabolic inhibitor reduced the treatment costs by> 50% without increased adverse events or drug monitoring needs. This intervention demonstrates how access of patients with limited resources to needed drugs can be improved by interference with physiological drug elimination.

Keywords: Azoles; India; co-administration; cyclosporine; nephrotic syndrome; pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study protocol
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cyclosporine trough levels
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reduction in dosage of cyclosporine after adding ketoconazole
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between cyclosporine trough levels and serum creatinine

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bagga A, Mantan M. Nephrotic syndrome in children. Indian J Med Res. 2005;122:13–28. - PubMed
    1. van Husen M, Kemper MJ. New therapies in steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:881–92. - PubMed
    1. Torban E, Bitzan M, Goodyer P. Recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: A discrete clinical entity. Int J Nephrol 2012. 2012 246128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choudhry S, Bagga A, Hari P, Sharma S, Kalaivani M, Dinda A. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:760–9. - PubMed
    1. Tejani AT, Butt K, Trachtman H, Suthanthiran M, Rosenthal CJ, Khawar MR. Cyclosporine A induced remission of relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children. Kidney Int. 1988;33:729–34. - PubMed