Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;109(2):234-48.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.401. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

Development of an online library of patient-reported outcome measures in gastroenterology: the GI-PRO database

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Development of an online library of patient-reported outcome measures in gastroenterology: the GI-PRO database

Puja Khanna et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Because gastrointestinal (GI) illnesses can cause physical, emotional, and social distress, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to guide clinical decision making, conduct research, and seek drug approval. It is important to develop a mechanism for identifying, categorizing, and evaluating the over 100 GI PROs that exist. Here we describe a new, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported, online PRO clearinghouse-the GI-PRO database.

Methods: Using a protocol developed by the NIH Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)), we performed a systematic review to identify English-language GI PROs. We abstracted PRO items and developed an online searchable item database. We categorized symptoms into content "bins" to evaluate a framework for GI symptom reporting. Finally, we assigned a score for the methodological quality of each PRO represented in the published literature (0-20 range; higher indicates better).

Results: We reviewed 15,697 titles (κ>0.6 for title and abstract selection), from which we identified 126 PROs. Review of the PROs revealed eight GI symptom "bins": (i) abdominal pain, (ii) bloat/gas, (iii) diarrhea, (iv) constipation, (v) bowel incontinence/soilage, (vi) heartburn/reflux, (vii) swallowing, and (viii) nausea/vomiting. In addition to these symptoms, the PROs covered four psychosocial domains: (i) behaviors, (ii) cognitions, (iii) emotions, and (iv) psychosocial impact. The quality scores were generally low (mean 8.88 ± 4.19; 0 (min)-20 (max). In addition, 51% did not include patient input in developing the PRO, and 41% provided no information on score interpretation.

Conclusions: GI PROs cover a wide range of biopsychosocial symptoms. Although plentiful, GI PROs are limited by low methodological quality. Our online PRO library (www.researchcore.org/gipro/) can help in selecting PROs for clinical and research purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Guarantor of the article: Brennan M.R. Spiegal, MD, MSHS.

Specific author contributions: P. Khanna and N. Agarwal designed the study, reviewed the citations for systematic review, assigned quality scores for the selected manuscripts, and wrote the first draft. D. Khanna and B. Spiegel are Pis of the NIH PROMIS grant. They designed the study, reviewed the citations for systematic review, assigned quality scores for the selected manuscripts, and revised the first draft. R.D. Hays designed the study, and developed and assigned quality scores for the selected manuscripts. L. Chang, R. Bolus, and G. Melmed designed the study and assigned quality scores for the selected manuscripts; CB. Whitman and R.M. Kaplan assigned quality scores for the selected manuscripts; R. Ogawa conducted the systematic review; B. Snyder designed the PRO website. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework of gastrointestinal (GI) symptom bins from items in published GI patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of GI PRO online library. Users initially view a text box in which any term can be entered that is relevant for a search of gastrointestinal (GI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments. Examples include names of known instruments (e.g., IBS-QOL, PAGI-QOL, IBDQ), names of diseases (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyspepsia, Crohn’s, Celiac), symptoms (e.g., bloating, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, pain), or health-related quality-of-life domains (e.g., sleep, fatigue, impact, embarrassment, depression). The example below shows the result of searching for “GERD”. Users can select individual instruments to obtain detailed information about them (e.g., inset shows details of ReQuest instrument).

References

    1. von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Gil KM, et al. Assessment of factors that contribute to decreased quality of life in Gynecologic Oncology Group ovarian cancer trials. Cancer. 2009;115:4857–4864. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von KorffM. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–544. - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:64–78. - PubMed
    1. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559–568. - PubMed
    1. Dobscha SK, Gerrity MS, Ward ME. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve primary care provider recognition of depression. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:163–171. - PubMed

Publication types