Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 17:13:135.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-135.

Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction

Affiliations

Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction

Christopher L Fillmore et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Healthcare costs are increasing rapidly and at an unsustainable rate in many countries, and inpatient hospitalizations are a significant driver of these costs. Clinical decision support (CDS) represents a promising approach to not only improve care but to reduce costs in the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to systematically review trials of CDS interventions with the potential to reduce inpatient costs, so as to identify promising interventions for more widespread implementation and to inform future research in this area.

Methods: To identify relevant studies, MEDLINE was searched up to July 2013. CDS intervention studies with the potential to reduce inpatient healthcare costs were identified through titles and abstracts, and full text articles were reviewed to make a final determination on inclusion. Relevant characteristics of the studies were extracted and summarized.

Results: Following a screening of 7,663 articles, 78 manuscripts were included. 78.2% of studies were controlled before-after studies, and 15.4% were randomized controlled trials. 53.8% of the studies were focused on pharmacotherapy. The majority of manuscripts were published during or after 2008. 70.5% of the studies resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in an explicit financial measure or a proxy financial measure. Only 12.8% of the studies directly measured the financial impact of an intervention, whereas the financial impact was inferred in the remainder of studies. Data on cost effectiveness was available for only one study.

Conclusions: Significantly more research is required on the impact of clinical decision support on inpatient costs. In particular, there is a remarkable gap in the availability of cost effectiveness studies required by policy makers and decision makers in healthcare systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of literature search and selection.

References

    1. Keehan SP, Cuckler GA, Sisko AM, Madison AJ, Smith SD, Lizonitz JM, Poisal JA, Wolfe CJ. National health expenditure projections: modest annual growth until coverage expands and economic growth accelerates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;13:1600–1612. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0404. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller HD. From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;13:1418–1428. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;13:141–145. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;13:1339–1346. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1339. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;13:1409–1416. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms