Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e80661.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080661. eCollection 2013.

Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature

Kristin B Klein et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used to stratify candidates for liver transplantation based on objective measures of disease severity. MELD has been validated as a predictor of wait-list mortality in transplantation candidates and has been postulated as a predictor of post-transplant survival. The purpose of this study was to examine the predictive value of the pre-transplantation MELD score on post-transplant survival from relevant existing studies. A systematic review and critical appraisal was performed using Cochrane guidelines. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles published in the English language since 2005 using a structured search strategy. There were 3058 discrete citations identified and screened for possible inclusion. Any study examining the relationship between pre-transplant MELD and post-transplant survival in the general transplant population was included. Thirty-seven studies met these criteria and were included in the review. Studies were all case series that typically involved stratified analyses of survival by MELD. They represented 15 countries and a total of 53,691 patients. There was significant clinical heterogeneity in patient populations across studies, which precluded performance of a meta-analysis. In 15 studies, no statistically significant association between MELD and post-transplant survival was found. In the remaining 22, some association was found. Eleven studies also measured predictive ability with c-statistics. Values were below 0.7 in all but two studies, suggesting poor predictive value. In summary, while the majority of studies reported an association between pre-transplantation MELD score and post-transplant survival, they represented a low level of evidence. Therefore, their findings should be interpreted conservatively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Literature search results and study selection for clinical review.

References

    1. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J et al. (2000) A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31(4): 864-871. doi:10.1053/he.2000.5852. PubMed: 10733541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Shusang V, Senzolo M, Rolles K et al. (2006) A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 12(7): 1049-1061. doi:10.1002/lt.20824. PubMed: 16799946. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oxford Centre for; Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Oxford (UK). Oxford: Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; (2011)..
    1. Cywinski JB, Mascha EJ, You J, Sessler DI, Kapural L et al. ( Feb 172011) Pre-transplant MELD and sodium MELD scores are poor predictors of graft failure and mortality after liver transplantation. Hepatol Int Feb 17 PubMed: 21484127. - PubMed
    1. Freeman RB, Harper A, Edwards EB (2005) Excellent liver transplant survival rates under the MELD/PELD system. Transplant Proc 37(2): 585-588. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.099. PubMed: 15848465. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types