Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e81688.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081688. eCollection 2013.

Appraisal of space words and allocation of emotion words in bodily space

Affiliations

Appraisal of space words and allocation of emotion words in bodily space

Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The body-specificity hypothesis (BSH) predicts that right-handers and left-handers allocate positive and negative concepts differently on the horizontal plane, i.e., while left-handers allocate negative concepts on the right-hand side of their bodily space, right-handers allocate such concepts to the left-hand side. Similar research shows that people, in general, tend to allocate positive and negative concepts in upper and lower areas, respectively, in relation to the vertical plane. Further research shows a higher salience of the vertical plane over the horizontal plane in the performance of sensorimotor tasks. The aim of the paper is to examine whether there should be a dominance of the vertical plane over the horizontal plane, not only at a sensorimotor level but also at a conceptual level. In Experiment 1, various participants from diverse linguistic backgrounds were asked to rate the words "up", "down", "left", and "right". In Experiment 2, right-handed participants from two linguistic backgrounds were asked to allocate emotion words into a square grid divided into four boxes of equal areas. Results suggest that the vertical plane is more salient than the horizontal plane regarding the allocation of emotion words and positively-valenced words were placed in upper locations whereas negatively-valenced words were placed in lower locations. Together, the results lend support to the BSH while also suggesting a higher saliency of the vertical plane over the horizontal plane in the allocation of valenced words.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean ratings for the spatial words across the twenty-two languages tested.
Plots A and B correspond to the mean ratings given by left- and right-handers, respectively, to the words “up” and “down”. Plots C and D correspond to the mean ratings given by left- and right-handers, respectively, to the words “left” and “right”. Languages: Arab  =  Arabic, Bulg  =  Bulgarian, Cebu  =  Cebuano, Chin  =  Chinese, Dut  =  Dutch, En  =  English, Esto  =  Estonian, Fin  =  Finish, Fr  =  French, Ger  =  German, Hebr  =  Hebrew, Hung  =  Hungarian, Ilon  =  Ilonggo, It  =  Italian, Jp  =  Japanese, Poli  =  Polish, Port  =  Portuguese, Rus  =  Russian, Serb  =  Serbian, Span  =  Spanish, Taga  =  Tagalog, Thai  =  Thai.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Results of Experiments 1 (A and B) and 2 (C – F).
Figures-trait words. Figure C shows the main effect of vertical location in the allocation of valenced words and Figure D shows the average frequency with which words were allocated in the spatial locations given word valence. Figures E and F represent the mean localised positions (X and Y coordinates in visual angles) on the computer screen for negative and positive words according to linguistic group (E) and across languages (F). Error bars represent 95% CIs.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the WAT.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22: 577–609. - PubMed
    1. Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59: 617–645. - PubMed
    1. Barsalou LW (2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Top Cogn Sci 2: 716–724. - PubMed
    1. Mishra RK, Marmolejo-Ramos F (2010) On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision. Cogn Process 11: 295–305. - PubMed
    1. Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 9: 558–565. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources