Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e83275.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083275. eCollection 2013.

A regression-based method for estimating risks and relative risks in case-base studies

Affiliations

A regression-based method for estimating risks and relative risks in case-base studies

Tina Tsz-Ting Chui et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Both the absolute risk and the relative risk (RR) have a crucial role to play in epidemiology. RR is often approximated by odds ratio (OR) under the rare-disease assumption in conventional case-control study; however, such a study design does not provide an estimate for absolute risk. The case-base study is an alternative approach which readily produces RR estimation without resorting to the rare-disease assumption. However, previous researchers only considered one single dichotomous exposure and did not elaborate how absolute risks can be estimated in a case-base study. In this paper, the authors propose a logistic model for the case-base study. The model is flexible enough to admit multiple exposures in any measurement scale-binary, categorical or continuous. It can be easily fitted using common statistical packages. With one additional step of simple calculations of the model parameters, one readily obtains relative and absolute risk estimates as well as their confidence intervals. Monte-Carlo simulations show that the proposed method can produce unbiased estimates and adequate-coverage confidence intervals, for ORs, RRs and absolute risks. The case-base study with all its desirable properties and its methods of analysis fully developed in this paper may become a mainstay in epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of diseased subjects recruited in control sample (A); Ratio of upper and lower bound of 95% confidence intervals of prevalence odds (B), in a case-base study of 200 distinct subjects (solid lines), 2000 distinct subjects (dashed lines) and 20000 distinct subjects (dotted lines).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kupper LL, McMichael AJ, Spirtas R (1975) A hybrid epidemiologic study design useful in estimating relative risk. J Am Stat Assoc 70: 524–528.
    1. Miettinen OS (1982) Design options in epidemiologic research: an update. Scand J Work Environ Health 8 (Suppl. 1)7–14. - PubMed
    1. Prentice RL (1986) A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 73: 1–11.
    1. Self SG, Prentice RL (1988) Asymptotic distribution theory and efficiency results for case-cohort studies. Ann Stat 16: 64–81.
    1. Barlow WE (1994) Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics 50: 1064–1072. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources