Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Nov;2(6):818-24.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.11.09.

Minimally invasive valve sparing mitral valve repair-the loop technique-how we do it

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive valve sparing mitral valve repair-the loop technique-how we do it

Stephan Jacobs et al. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Mitral valve insufficiency is the second most common heart valve disease, with untreated regurgitation leading to enlargement of the left atrium (LA), atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Besides functional regurgitation, the main cause is degenerative valve disease with elongation of the chordae tendineae and prolapsing of the leaflets. Surgical repair is the gold standard therapy for mitral valve insufficiency today. Recently, the implantation of neochordae (the "loop-technique") has been established and is the preferred technique in many centres including ours. Results of surgical mitral valve repair are good with low rates of re-intervention and mortality. With minimally invasive techniques, patient satisfaction is high and hospital stay is short. In conclusion, mitral valve repair should be the preferred strategy in patients with symptomatic mitral valve insufficiency or with asymptomatic mitral valve insufficiency in accordance with the guidelines. Modern repair techniques like neo-chord implantation with the loop-technique combined with minimally invasive access routes result in low mortality and morbidity and short hospital stay as well as high patient satisfaction.

Keywords: Mitral valve repair; minimally invasive surgery; operative setup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OR Setup.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chest wall landmarks before any incisions are made.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incision with soft-tissue retractor, transthoracic Chitwood clamp, Camera with CO2 supply and arm for the atrial roof retractor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pericardial incision site after putting two pericardial sutures and a suture in the epicardial fat above the interatrial grove.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cardioplegia insertion and cross clamp. Below the aorta, where suction is placed.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Left atriotomy to expose the mitral valve.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Segments of the mitral valve. A, anterior; P, posterior.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Estimation of necessary chordal length with a caliper.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Neo-chordae insertion and fixation at the free margin of P2.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Measurement of the necessary annuloplasty ring size after implantation of ring sutures (green).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Implanted annuloplasty ring with the sutures partially knotted.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Left atriotomy closure.

References

    1. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Doll N, et al. Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:532-8 - PubMed
    1. Carabello BA. The current therapy for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:319-26 - PubMed
    1. Jokinen JJ, Hippeläinen MJ, Pitkänen OA, et al. Mitral valve replacement versus repair: propensity-adjusted survival and quality-of-life analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:451-8 - PubMed
    1. Goldstone AB, Atluri P, Szeto WY, et al. Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:748-56 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markar SR, Sadat U, Edmonds L, et al. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly population. J Heart Valve Dis 2011;20:265-71 - PubMed