Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions
- PMID: 24351497
- PMCID: PMC3839390
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X675395
Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate attendances may account for up to 40% of presentations at accident and emergency (A&E) departments. There is considerable interest from health practitioners and policymakers in interventions to reduce this burden.
Aim: To review the evidence on primary care service interventions to reduce inappropriate A&E attendances.
Design and setting: Systematic review of UK and international primary care interventions.
Method: Studies published in English between 1 January 1986 and 23 August 2011 were identified from PubMed, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, the Cochrane Collaboration, and Health Technology Assessment databases. The outcome measures were A&E attendances, patient satisfaction, clinical outcome, and intervention cost. Two authors reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved results, with adjudication of disagreements conducted by the third. Studies were quality assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist system where applicable.
Results: In total, 9916 manuscripts were identified, of which 34 were reviewed. Telephone triage was the single best-evaluated intervention. This resulted in negligible impact on A&E attendance, but exhibited acceptable patient satisfaction and clinical safety; cost effectiveness was uncertain. The limited available evidence suggests that emergency nurse practitioners in community settings and community health centres may reduce A&E attendance. For all other interventions considered in this review (walk-in centres, minor injuries units, and out-of-hours general practice), the effects on A&E attendance, patient outcomes, and cost were inconclusive.
Conclusion: Studies showed a negligible effect on A&E attendance for all interventions; data on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness are limited. There is an urgent need to examine all aspects of primary care service interventions that aim to reduce inappropriate A&E attendance.
Comment in
-
Reducing inappropriate A&E attendances.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Feb;64(619):70. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677031. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 24567592 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Blunt I, Bardsley M, Dixon J. Is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency? London: Nuffield Trust; 2010. Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004–2009. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/publications/trends-emergency-admissions... [accessed 25 Oct 2013].
-
- Martin A, Martin C, Martin PB, et al. ‘Inappropriate’ attendance at an accident and emergency department by adults registered in local general practices: how is it related to their use of primary care? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(3):160–165. - PubMed
-
- Cooke MW, Fisher J, Dale J, et al. Warwick: The University of Warwick; 2004. Reducing attendances and waits in emergency departments: a systematic review of present innovations Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO)
-
- Doobinin KA, Heidt-Davis PE, Gross TK, Isaacman DJ. Nonurgent pediatric emergency department visits: Care-seeking behavior and parental knowledge of insurance. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19(1):10–14. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources