Optimal force for maxillary protraction facemask therapy in the early treatment of class III malocclusion
- PMID: 24351569
- DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjt091
Optimal force for maxillary protraction facemask therapy in the early treatment of class III malocclusion
Abstract
Background: The facemask is used to treat early class III malocclusion, in combination with expansion therapy. There is a great deal of controversy in literature regarding the effectiveness of protraction facemask treatment as studies report results anywhere from considerable changes to lack of any maxillary improvement. This controversy may be due to the fact that the process of placing the orthopaedic facemask on patients has, in part, been done empirically, without the use of literature containing the clinical parameters for facemask placement for maxillary protraction.
Objective: To determine the optimal magnitude, duration, and direction that should be used in maxillary protraction facemask therapy.
Search methods: A systematic search was carried out in the following databases: Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo, with no restriction placed on the year of publication, in English and Spanish, using MeSH terms and free-text terms.
Selection criteria: Clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies were included, whereas literature reviews, case reports, case series, symposiums, compendiums, pilot studies, and expert opinions were excluded.
Data collection and analysis: Data selection and extraction were blinded and performed independently, and the methodology was evaluated using various scales.
Results: A total of 223 articles were found. After eliminating repeated articles and those that did not meet the selection criteria, 14 remained for analysis. Regarding magnitude, there were values ranging from 180 to 800g per side; there were force vector direction values between 20 and 30 degrees below the occlusal plane or parallel to the occlusal plane; and a duration ranging from 10 to 24 hours of use per day.
Conclusions: There is no scientific evidence that would allow for the definition of adequate parameters for force magnitude, direction, and duration for maxillary protraction facemask treatment in class III patients.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.038. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015. PMID: 26432320 Clinical Trial.
-
Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up.J Orthod. 2012 Sep;39(3):176-85. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028. J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 22984102 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.Prog Orthod. 2015;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25. Prog Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26303311 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247027. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33617540 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment effect of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients compared to controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2021 Jan 29;43(1):51-68. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa016. Eur J Orthod. 2021. PMID: 32815989
Cited by
-
Stress on facial skin of class III subjects during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2019 Feb 13;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0724-6. BMC Oral Health. 2019. PMID: 30760252 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Management of Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Survey among SIDO Members.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;12(7):207. doi: 10.3390/dj12070207. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39056994 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of facemask therapy on the mandibular retromolar space. A follow-up study.Saudi Med J. 2018 Aug;39(8):815-821. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.8.22292. Saudi Med J. 2018. PMID: 30106420 Free PMC article.
-
Do we pay for maxillary protraction? Evaluation of the effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol and face mask treatment on root development.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):3203-3211. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04302-y. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34821977
-
Early treatment of Class III malocclusion with facemask therapy.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018 Nov 18;4(6):279-283. doi: 10.1002/cre2.144. eCollection 2018 Dec. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018. PMID: 30603110 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources