Assessment of proficiency and competency in laboratory animal biomethodologies

Abstract

Personnel working with laboratory animals are required by laws and guidelines to be trained and qualified to perform biomethodologic procedures. The assessment of competency and proficiency is a vital component of a laboratory animal training program, because this process confirms that the trainees have met the learning objectives for a particular procedure. The approach toward qualification assessment differs between organizations because laws and guidelines do not outline how the assessment should be performed or which methods and tools should be used. Assessment of clinical and surgical medicine has received considerable attention over the last few decades and has progressed from simple subjective methods to well-defined and objective methods of assessing competency. Although biomethodology competency and proficiency assessment is discussed in the literature, a standard and objective assessment method has not yet been developed. The development and implementation of an objective and standardized biomethodologic assessment program can serve as a tool to improve standards, ensure consistent training, and decrease research variables yet ensure animal welfare. Here we review the definition and goals of training and assessment, review assessment methods, and propose a method to develop a standard and objective assessment program for the laboratory animal science field, particularly training departments and IACUC.

Figure 1.

Competency assessment score sheet for dorsal scruff restraint technique. The first column lists the core competency. The second column addresses the ‘unacceptable’ method, scored as a 0. The third column lists the ‘needs improvement’ method, scored as a 1. The fourth column indicates the ‘acceptable’ method, scored as a 2. This score sheet is using a 3-score competency system (0, 1, 2), with a maximum score of 6, which is the passing score. It also includes instructions on scoring to ensure that trainees who perform unacceptable methods are not assessed as competent.

Figure 2.

Competency assessment checklist for mouse physical restraint technique. Note that this form requires initials from both the trainee and the trainer, ensuring that both persons understand how the procedure is being assessed.