Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Mar;149(3):275-87.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654.

The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012

Su-Hsin Chang et al. JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Importance: The prevalence of obesity and outcomes of bariatric surgery are well established. However, analyses of the surgery impact have not been updated and comprehensively investigated since 2003.

Objective: To examine the effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery using up-to-date, comprehensive data and appropriate meta-analytic techniques.

Data sources: Literature searches of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Current Contents, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov between 2003 and 2012 were performed.

Study selection: Exclusion criteria included publication of abstracts only, case reports, letters, comments, or reviews; animal studies; languages other than English; duplicate studies; no surgical intervention; and no population of interest. Inclusion criteria were a report of surgical procedure performed and at least 1 outcome of interest resulting from the studied surgery was reported: comorbidities, mortality, complications, reoperations, or weight loss. Of the 25,060 initially identified articles, 24,023 studies met the exclusion criteria, and 259 met the inclusion criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: A review protocol was followed throughout. Three reviewers independently reviewed studies, abstracted data, and resolved disagreements by consensus. Studies were evaluated for quality.

Main outcomes and measures: Mortality, complications, reoperations, weight loss, and remission of obesity-related diseases.

Results: A total of 164 studies were included (37 randomized clinical trials and 127 observational studies). Analyses included 161,756 patients with a mean age of 44.56 years and body mass index of 45.62. We conducted random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression. In randomized clinical trials, the mortality rate within 30 days was 0.08% (95% CI, 0.01%-0.24%); the mortality rate after 30 days was 0.31% (95% CI, 0.01%-0.75%). Body mass index loss at 5 years postsurgery was 12 to 17. The complication rate was 17% (95% CI, 11%-23%), and the reoperation rate was 7% (95% CI, 3%-12%). Gastric bypass was more effective in weight loss but associated with more complications. Adjustable gastric banding had lower mortality and complication rates; yet, the reoperation rate was higher and weight loss was less substantial than gastric bypass. Sleeve gastrectomy appeared to be more effective in weight loss than adjustable gastric banding and comparable with gastric bypass.

Conclusions and relevance: Bariatric surgery provides substantial and sustained effects on weight loss and ameliorates obesity-attributable comorbidities in the majority of bariatric patients, although risks of complication, reoperation, and death exist. Death rates were lower than those reported in previous meta-analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study attrition diagram
BMI: body mass index; ΔBMI: BMI change; %EWL: percent excess weight loss; RCT: randomized controlled trial; OBS: observational studies. Remission is defined as the target comorbid condition being either resolved or improved after surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of BMI change after surgery

References

    1. World Health Statistics 2010. World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Farzadfar F, Finucane MM, Danaei G, et al. National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3.0 million participants. Lancet. 2011 Feb 12;377(9765):578–586. - PubMed
    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):235–241. - PubMed
    1. Beason TS, Colditz GA. Obesity and Multiple Myeloma. In: Mittelman SD, Berger NA, editors. Energy Balance and Jematologic Malignancies. Vol. 5. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 71–95.
    1. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999 Oct 27;282(16):1523–1529. - PubMed

Publication types