Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;1(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296049.

Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury

Joost J van Middendorp et al. Global Spine J. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Despite promising advances in basic spinal cord repair research, no effective therapy resulting in major neurological or functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is available to date. The neurological examination according to the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients (International Standards) has become the cornerstone in the assessment of the severity and level of the injury. Based on parameters from the International Standards, physicians are able to inform patients about the predicted long-term outcomes, including the ability to walk, with high accuracy. In those patients who cannot participate in a reliable physical neurological examination, magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological examinations may provide useful diagnostic and prognostic information. As clinical research on this topic continues, the prognostic value of the reviewed diagnostic assessments will become more accurate in the near future. These advances will provide useful information for physicians to counsel tSCI patients and their families during the catastrophic initial phase after the injury.

Keywords: diagnosis; prognosis; review; spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The scoring form of the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients, available on the following Web site: http://www.asia-spinalinjury.org/publications/59544_Sc_Exam_Sheet_r4.pdf
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of the cervical spinal cord in a patient with a traumatic spinal cord injury. The three classical features of a severe spinal cord injury, including spinal cord hemorrhage (C4–C6), spinal cord edema (C1–T3, very distinct), and spinal cord swelling (C1–T3, not very distinct) are present.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphic representation of the predicted probability of independent ambulation 1 year postinjury based on the prediction rule score. The prediction rule score (x-axis, see Table 4 ) is plotted out against the probability of walking independently 1 year postinjury (y-axis). The light gray area around the curve represents the 95% confidence interval of the prediction rule based on the regression model. The dashed lines are a visual aid to determine the probability of walking independently.

References

    1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (SCISC). The 2008 annual statistical report for the spinal cord injury model systems. Available at: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/public_content/pdf/2008%20NSCISC%20Annual%20S.... Accessed February 2010
    1. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006;44:523–529. - PubMed
    1. Norton L. Spinal Cord Injury, Australia 2007–08. Injury Research and Statistics Series No. 52. Cat No. INJCAT 128. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; 2010
    1. van Middendorp JJ Hosman AJ Pouw MH Van de Meent H; EM-SCI Study Group. Is determination between complete and incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury clinically relevant? Validation of the ASIA sacral sparing criteria in a prospective cohort of 432 patients Spinal Cord 200947809–816. - PubMed
    1. Lopez AD Mathers CD Ezzati M Jamison DT Murray CJL, eds. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006