Open-door cervical laminoplasty with preservation of posterior structures
- PMID: 24353941
- PMCID: PMC3864484
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1307258
Open-door cervical laminoplasty with preservation of posterior structures
Abstract
Objective To demonstrate that preservation of all posterior structures during open-door laminoplasty (ODL) is associated with a significant preservation of motion. Methods Fifteen patients underwent cervical ODL by one surgeon for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An open-door technique was employed, and the laminae on the open side were reconstructed using miniplates with allograft strut bone graft. All spinous processes and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments were preserved within the operative levels and between supra- and subjacent levels in all patients. Postoperative radiographs were obtained 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months. Computed tomography scans were obtained at 12 months. Results There were no significant intraoperative or perioperative complications. Postoperatively, the neutral angle was 6.8 ± 11.5 degrees (95% confidence interval: 0.5 to 13.1), representing a loss of lordosis of 3 degrees (not significant). The difference between the preoperative and postoperative arc range of motion was 5.96 ± 11.9 degrees (confidence interval: -0.62 to 12.5). The average percent loss of motion was 3.5% ± (0.1 to 6.9%). Four patients had an increased range of motion postoperatively. Conclusion Open-door laminoplasty with preservation of all posterior structures provides greater preservation of motion than has been previously described.
Keywords: alignment; cervical spondylotic myelopathy; laminoplasty; open-door laminoplasty; range of motion.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):1697-1704. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003158. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31794507
-
Biomechanics of open-door laminoplasty with and without preservation of posterior structures.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):746-51. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15229. Epub 2016 Jan 22. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26799115
-
A refined method of en bloc open-door laminoplasty for resection of intradural spinal tumors in the thoracic and lumbar spine.J Orthop Sci. 2022 Jan;27(1):84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 29. J Orthop Sci. 2022. PMID: 33384218
-
Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 13;7(19):3348-3352. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.739. eCollection 2019 Oct 15. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31949541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative effectiveness of different types of cervical laminoplasty.Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013 Oct;4(2):105-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357361. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013. PMID: 24436708 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Open-Door Laminoplasty Using Lateral Mass Anchoring Screws and Nonabsorbable Sutures in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy.Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(4):477-484. doi: 10.4055/cios20013. Epub 2020 Jul 13. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 33274025 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/os.13058. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 34904370 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of expert-level therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy using ensemble machine learning algorithms.Front Surg. 2022 Sep 6;9:1010420. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010420. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36147698 Free PMC article.
-
Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(6):572-586. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699208. Epub 2017 May 31. Global Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28894688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for open-door laminoplasty.Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1365-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5533-0. Epub 2018 Feb 28. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29492718
References
-
- Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K. et al.Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine. 2006;31:2998–3005. - PubMed
-
- Otani K, Sato K, Yabuki S, Iwabuchi M, Kikuchi S. A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 2009;34:268–273. - PubMed
-
- Wang M Y Green B A Open-door cervical expansile laminoplasty Neurosurgery 200454119–123.; discussion 123–124 - PubMed
-
- Ratliff J K, Cooper P R. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(3, Suppl):230–238. - PubMed
-
- Gore D R, Sepic S B, Gardner G M. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine. 1986;11:521–524. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources