Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun;2(2):105-8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315453.

Cervical total disc arthroplasty

Affiliations
Review

Cervical total disc arthroplasty

Rahul Basho et al. Global Spine J. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration of the cervical spine remains problematic for patients and surgeons alike. Despite advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation, the solution remains elusive. Spurred by the success of total joint arthroplasty in hips and knees, surgeons and industry have turned to motion preservation devices in the cervical spine. By preserving motion at the diseased level, the hope is that adjacent segment degeneration can be prevented. Multiple cervical disc arthroplasty devices have come onto the market and completed Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trials. Though some of the early results demonstrate equivalency of arthroplasty to fusion, compelling evidence of benefits in terms of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration are lacking. In addition, non-industry-sponsored studies indicate that these devices are equivalent to fusion in terms of adjacent segment degeneration. Longer-term studies will eventually provide the definitive answer.

Keywords: ACDF; adjacent segment; cervical arthroplasty; cervical fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Smith G W, Robinson R A. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40-A:607–624. - PubMed
    1. Cloward R B. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15:602–617. - PubMed
    1. Cepoiu-Martin M, Faris P, Lorenzetti D, Prefontaine E, Noseworthy T, Sutherland L. Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine. 2011;36:E1623–E1633. - PubMed
    1. Hilibrand A S, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6, Suppl):190S–194S. - PubMed
    1. Schwab J S, Diangelo D J, Foley K T. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine. 2006;31:2439–2448. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources