Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-8.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008

Lawrence B Finer  1 , Mia R Zolna
Affiliations

Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008

Lawrence B Finer et al. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: We monitored trends in pregnancy by intendedness and outcomes of unintended pregnancies nationally and for key subgroups between 2001 and 2008.

Methods: Data on pregnancy intentions from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) and a nationally representative survey of abortion patients were combined with counts of births (from the National Center for Health Statistics), counts of abortions (from a census of abortion providers), estimates of miscarriages (from the NSFG), and population denominators from the US Census Bureau to obtain pregnancy rates by intendedness.

Results: In 2008, 51% of pregnancies in the United States were unintended, and the unintended pregnancy rate was 54 per 1000 women ages 15 to 44 years. Between 2001 and 2008, intended pregnancies decreased and unintended pregnancies increased, a shift previously unobserved. Large disparities in unintended pregnancy by relationship status, income, and education increased; the percentage of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion decreased; and the rate of unintended pregnancies ending in birth increased, reaching 27 per 1000 women.

Conclusions: Reducing unintended pregnancy likely requires addressing fundamental socioeconomic inequities, as well as increasing contraceptive use and the uptake of highly effective methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Unintended pregnancy rate by race/ethnicity and poverty status among US women: 2008.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010. Healthy People 2020 topics and objectives. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.as.... Accessed August 10, 2012.
    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84(5):478–485. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guttmacher Institute. A Real-Time Look at the Impact of the Recession on Women’s Family Planning and Pregnancy Decisions. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2009.
    1. Gold RB. Recession taking its toll: family planning safety net stretched thin as service demand increases. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2010;13(1):8–12.
    1. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):893–897. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types