Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Summer;17(3):65-73.
doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-064.

Current management of fecal incontinence

Affiliations
Review

Current management of fecal incontinence

Jennifer Y Wang et al. Perm J. 2013 Summer.

Abstract

Objective: To review the management of fecal incontinence, which affects more than 1 in 10 people and can have a substantial negative impact on quality of life.

Methods: The medical literature between 1980 and April 2012 was reviewed for the evaluation and management of fecal incontinence.

Results: A comprehensive history and physical examination are required to help understand the severity and type of symptoms and the cause of incontinence. Treatment options range from medical therapy and minimally invasive interventions to more invasive procedures with varying degrees of morbidity. The treatment approach must be tailored to each patient. Many patients can have substantial improvement in symptoms with dietary management and biofeedback therapy. For younger patients with large sphincter defects, sphincter repair can be helpful. For patients in whom biofeedback has failed, other options include injectable medications, radiofrequency ablation, or sacral nerve stimulation. Patients with postdefecation fecal incontinence and a rectocele can benefit from rectocele repair. An artificial bowel sphincter is reserved for patients with more severe fecal incontinence.

Conclusion: The treatment algorithm for fecal incontinence will continue to evolve as additional data become available on newer technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Internal and external anal sphincter muscles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Anorectal angle.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cloacal defect with absence of perineum in a patient with severe obstetric tear.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A (above) Patient with large anterior rectocele. B (right) Defecography demonstrating an anterior rectocele.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
A (left) Setup for anorectal manometry. B (above) Catheter with balloon at tip for anorectal manometry.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Setup for pudendal nerve motor latency and anal electromyography testing.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Three-dimensional pelvic ultrasound machine.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Rectal irrigation set.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Patient with large prolapsing hemorrhoids and pseudoincontinence.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Patient with full-thickness rectal and vaginal prolapse.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Anal sphincter repair in a patient with prior traumatic childbirth injury.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Illustration of a gracilis flap rotation to reach the perineal area for anal sphincter muscle repair.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Acticon artificial bowel sphincter. Reprinted with permission from American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN.
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
A (left) In the closed position (at rest) Fenix magnetic bowel sphincter provides continence. B (right) Fenix magnetic bowel sphincter expands with straining to allow voluntary passage of stool. Reprinted with permission from Torax Medical, Shoreview, MN.
Figure 15.
Figure 15.
Secca radiofrequency energy device. Reprinted with permission from Mederi Therapeutics, Greenwich, CT.
Figure 16.
Figure 16.
Sacral nerve stimulator. Reprinted with permission from Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Halli AD, et al. Prevalence and correlates of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):629–35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53211.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quander CR, Morris MC, Melson J, Bienias JL, Evans DA. Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):905–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.30511.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2009 Aug;137(2):512–7. 517.e1–2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, et al. Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study Team Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut. 2002 Apr;50(4):480–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.4.480. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook TA, Mortensen NJ. Management of faecal incontinence following obstetric injury. Br J Surg. 1998 Mar;85(3):293–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00693.x. - DOI - PubMed