Comparative investigation of the use of various commercial microcarriers as a substrate for culturing mammalian cells
- PMID: 24357035
- DOI: 10.1007/s11626-013-9717-y
Comparative investigation of the use of various commercial microcarriers as a substrate for culturing mammalian cells
Erratum in
- In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2014 Aug;50(7):675
Abstract
Microcarriers provide large adhesion area allowing high cell densities in bioreactor systems. This study focused on the investigation of cell adhesion and cell growth characteristics of both anchorage-dependent CHO-K1 and anchorage-independent Ag8 myeloma cell lines cultivated on four different microcarriers (Biosilon®, Microhex®, Cytodex 3®, Cytoline 2®) by considering the cell kinetics and physiological data. Experiments were performed in both static and agitated cell culture systems by using 24-well tissue culture plates and then 50-ml spinner flasks. In agitated cultures, the highest specific growth rates (0.026 h for CHO-K1 and 0.061 h for Ag8 cell line) were obtained with Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2® microcarriers for CHO-K1 and Ag8 cell line, respectively. Metabolic characteristics showed some variation among the cultures with the four microcarriers. The most significant being the higher production of lactate with microcarriers with CHO-K1 cells relative to the Ag8 cells. SEM analyses revealed the differences in the morphology of the cells along with microcarriers. On Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2®, CHO-K1 cells attached to the substratum through long, slender filopodia, whereas the cells showed a flat morphology by covering the substratum on the Biosilon® and Microhex®. Ag8 cells maintained their spherical shapes throughout the culture for all types of microcarriers. In an attempt to scale-up, productions were carried out in 50-ml spinner flasks. Cytodex 3® (for CHO-K1 cells) and Cytoline 2® (for Ag8 cells) were evaluated. The results demonstrate that high yield of biomass could be achieved through the immobilization of the cells in each culture system. And cell cultures on microcarriers, especially on Cytodex 3® and Cytoline 2®, represented a good potential as microcarriers for larger scale cultures of CHO-K1 and Ag8, respectively. Moreover, owing to the fact that the cell lines and culture media are specific, outcomes will be applicable for other clones derived from the same host cell lines.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of macroporous and microporous carriers for CHO-K1 cell growth and monoclonal antibody production.J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Sep 28;23(9):1308-21. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1304.04011. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013. PMID: 23711520
-
Cell attachment to microcarriers affects growth, metabolic activity, and culture productivity in bioreactor culture.Biotechnol Prog. 2007 May-Jun;23(3):652-60. doi: 10.1021/bp070007l. Epub 2007 May 15. Biotechnol Prog. 2007. PMID: 17500530
-
Limiting cell aggregation during mesenchymal stem cell expansion on microcarriers.Biotechnol Prog. 2012 May-Jun;28(3):780-7. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1527. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Biotechnol Prog. 2012. PMID: 22374883
-
Growth, metabolic activity, and productivity of immobilized and freely suspended CHO cells in perfusion culture.Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2013 Jul-Aug;60(4):436-45. doi: 10.1002/bab.1103. Epub 2013 May 23. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2013. PMID: 23701045
-
High cell density and productivity culture of Chinese hamster ovary cells in a fluidized bed bioreactor.Cytotechnology. 1999 May;29(3):215-20. doi: 10.1023/A:1008064217040. Cytotechnology. 1999. PMID: 19003344 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cartilage by the Use of Stem Cells: A Strategy to Improve Regeneration.Materials (Basel). 2018 Sep 17;11(9):1749. doi: 10.3390/ma11091749. Materials (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30227656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites produced in HeLa cells adhered to Cytodex 1 microcarriers as antigen in serological assays: an application of microcarrier technology.Cytotechnology. 2019 Feb;71(1):91-105. doi: 10.1007/s10616-018-0269-6. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Cytotechnology. 2019. PMID: 30607647 Free PMC article.
-
Bioprinting and Differentiation of Stem Cells.Molecules. 2016 Sep 8;21(9):1188. doi: 10.3390/molecules21091188. Molecules. 2016. PMID: 27617991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.Chem Rev. 2020 Oct 14;120(19):11056-11092. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00126. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Chem Rev. 2020. PMID: 32558555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D bioprinting for orthopaedic applications: Current advances, challenges and regulatory considerations.Bioprinting. 2020 Dec;20:None. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00103. Bioprinting. 2020. PMID: 34853818 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources