This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2014 May;28(5):1413-24.

doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery

Fred Brody¹, Nathan G Richards

Affiliations

Affiliation

¹ Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 6B, Washington D.C., 20037, USA, fbrody@mfa.gwu.edu.

PMID: 24357422
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4

Review

Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery

Fred Brody et al. Surg Endosc. 2014 May.

. 2014 May;28(5):1413-24.

doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Authors

Fred Brody¹, Nathan G Richards

Affiliation

¹ Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 6B, Washington D.C., 20037, USA, fbrody@mfa.gwu.edu.

PMID: 24357422
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis.
Nezhat FR, Sirota I. Nezhat FR, et al. JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):e2014.00094. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 25489208 Free PMC article.
Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Heemskerk J, et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Jun;17(3):171-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007. PMID: 17581459
[Laparoscopic principles of robotic surgery].
Castillo OA, Sánchez-Salas R. Castillo OA, et al. Arch Esp Urol. 2007 May;60(4):357-62. doi: 10.4321/s0004-06142007000400005. Arch Esp Urol. 2007. PMID: 17626527 Review. Spanish.
Robotic endocrine surgery: state of the art.
Taskin HE, Arslan NC, Aliyev S, Berber E. Taskin HE, et al. World J Surg. 2013 Dec;37(12):2731-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2154-y. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23897443 Review.
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Sarlos D, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010. PMID: 20207063

See all similar articles

Cited by

Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.
Boggi U, Napoli N, Costa F, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Vistoli F, Amorese G. Boggi U, et al. World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2497-506. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3565-3. World J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27206401
Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study.
Boggi U, Palladino S, Massimetti G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Amorese G, Mosca F. Boggi U, et al. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25159652
Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Montalti R, Berardi G, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI. Montalti R, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 21;21(27):8441-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8441. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26217097 Free PMC article.
Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence.
Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A. Ahmad A, et al. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4966-y. Epub 2016 May 18. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27194264
Robotic surgery in children: adopt now, await, or dismiss?
Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Khurana S, Darzi A. Cundy TP, et al. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Dec;31(12):1119-25. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3800-2. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015. PMID: 26416688 Review.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):814-23 - PubMed
1. Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Sep;21(5):415-9 - PubMed
1. J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):447-53 - PubMed
1. J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1392-8 - PubMed
1. Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):254-62 - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Springer
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations