Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening strategies for congenital heart disease
- PMID: 24357432
- PMCID: PMC5278773
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.13287
Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening strategies for congenital heart disease
Abstract
Objective: The economic implications of strategies to improve prenatal screening for congenital heart disease (CHD) in low-risk mothers have not been explored. The aim was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening methods.
Methods: We constructed a decision analytic model of CHD prenatal screening strategies (four-chamber screen (4C), 4C + outflow, nuchal translucency (NT) or fetal echocardiography) populated with probabilities from the literature. The model included whether initial screens were interpreted by a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist and different referral strategies if they were read by a non-MFM specialist. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per defect detected. Costs were obtained from Medicare National Fee estimates. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken on model variables commensurate with their degree of uncertainty.
Results: In base-case analysis, 4C + outflow referred to an MFM specialist was the least costly strategy per defect detected. The 4C screen and the NT screen were dominated by other strategies (i.e. were more costly and less effective). Fetal echocardiography was the most effective, but most costly. On simulation of 10 000 low-risk pregnancies, 4C + outflow screen referred to an MFM specialist remained the least costly per defect detected. For an additional $580 per defect detected, referral to cardiology after a 4C + outflow was the most cost-effective for the majority of iterations, increasing CHD detection by 13 percentage points.
Conclusions: The addition of examination of the outflow tracts to second-trimester ultrasound increases detection of CHD in the most cost-effective manner. Strategies to improve outflow-tract imaging and to refer with the most efficiency may be the best way to improve detection at a population level.
Keywords: congenital heart disease; cost; cost analysis; nuchal translucency measurement; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal ultrasound.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Detection of fetal cardiac anomalies: cost-effectiveness of increased number of cardiac views.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):758-767. doi: 10.1002/uog.21977. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31945242
-
Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening methods for congenital heart defects in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):979-986. doi: 10.1002/uog.22048. Epub 2021 May 5. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32304621
-
Impact of maternal obesity on fetal cardiac screening: which follow-up strategy is cost-effective?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;56(5):705-716. doi: 10.1002/uog.21895. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31614030
-
Nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac malformations.Ultraschall Med. 2010 Apr;31(2):144-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109702. Epub 2010 Jan 21. Ultraschall Med. 2010. PMID: 20094976 Review.
-
The nuchal translucency and the fetal heart: a literature review.Prenat Diagn. 2009 Aug;29(8):739-48. doi: 10.1002/pd.2281. Prenat Diagn. 2009. PMID: 19399754 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of USAID-funded obstetric ultrasound service interventions on maternal and perinatal health outcomes at primary healthcare facilities in Ethiopia: a propensity score matching analysis.BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):e065351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065351. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36220324 Free PMC article.
-
Current Postlaunch Implementation of State Mandates of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease by Pulse Oximetry in U.S. States and Hospitals.Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e550-e562. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756327. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Am J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 36580978 Free PMC article.
-
The Ultrasonic Microsurgical Anatomical Comparative Study of the CHD Fetuses and Their Clinical Significance.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:520394. doi: 10.1155/2015/520394. Epub 2015 Nov 10. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26640788 Free PMC article.
-
The Cost of Prenatal Care Services in the City of Aydın: A Cross-Sectional Study.Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019 Oct 1;27(3):253-262. doi: 10.26650/FNJN423377. eCollection 2019 Oct. Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019. PMID: 34267979 Free PMC article.
-
How to Acquire Cardiac Volumes for Sonographic Examination of the Fetal Heart: Part 1.J Ultrasound Med. 2016 May;35(5):1021-42. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.01081. Epub 2016 Apr 18. J Ultrasound Med. 2016. PMID: 27091914 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hoffman JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol. 1995;16:155–165. - PubMed
-
- Kleinert S. Routine prenatal screening for congenital heart disease. Lancet. 1996;348:836. - PubMed
-
- Stumpfen I, Stumpfen A, Wimmer M, Bernaschek G. Effect of detailed fetal echocardiography as part of routine prenatal ultrasonographic screening on detection of congenital heart disease. Lancet. 1996;348:854–857. - PubMed
-
- AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1083–1101. - PubMed
-
- AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:157–166. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials