Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;2(1):10.1002/sta4.22.
doi: 10.1002/sta4.22.

Practical Marginalized Multilevel Models

Affiliations

Practical Marginalized Multilevel Models

Michael E Griswold et al. Stat. 2013.

Abstract

Clustered data analysis is characterized by the need to describe both systematic variation in a mean model and cluster-dependent random variation in an association model. Marginalized multilevel models embrace the robustness and interpretations of a marginal mean model, while retaining the likelihood inference capabilities and flexible dependence structures of a conditional association model. Although there has been increasing recognition of the attractiveness of marginalized multilevel models, there has been a gap in their practical application arising from a lack of readily available estimation procedures. We extend the marginalized multilevel model to allow for nonlinear functions in both the mean and association aspects. We then formulate marginal models through conditional specifications to facilitate estimation with mixed model computational solutions already in place. We illustrate the MMM and approximate MMM approaches on a cerebrovascular deficiency crossover trial using SAS and an epidemiological study on race and visual impairment using R. Datasets, SAS and R code are included as supplemental materials.

Keywords: generalized linear mixed model; latent variable; likelihood inference; marginal model; nonlinear mixed model; random effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Crossover Trial Profile Likelihoods: All methods provide similar evidence about the marginal treatment effect. Tabled values are the k = 8; 16 Support Intervals (SI) and the Likelihood Ratio comparing the MLE for the treatment effect α^1 to no treatment effect, α1 = 0 (LR0).

References

    1. Amemiya T. Qualitative response models: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 1981;19(4):1483–1536.
    1. Beal S, Sheiner L. Heteroscedastic nonlinear regression. Technometrics. 1988;30(3):327–338.
    1. Blume J. Likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence. Statistics in medicine. 2002;21(17):2563–2599. - PubMed
    1. Booth J, Caffo B. Unequal sampling for Monte Carlo EM algorithms. Computational statistics & data analysis. 2002;39(3):261–270.
    1. Booth J, Hobert J, Jank W. A survey of Monte Carlo algorithms for maximizing the likelihood of a two-stage hierarchical model. Statistical Modelling. 2001;1(4):333.

LinkOut - more resources