Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec 15;5(4):692-8.
eCollection 2006.

Indirect calorimetry during ultradistance running: a case report

Affiliations

Indirect calorimetry during ultradistance running: a case report

Charles L Dumke et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the energy expenditure during ultradistance trail running. A portable metabolic unit was carried by a male subject for the first 64.5 km portion of the Western States 100 running race. Calibrations were done with known gases and volumes at ambient temperature, humidity and pressure (23-40.5 °C and 16-40% respectively). Altitude averaged 1692.8 ± 210 m during data collection. The male subject (36 yrs, 75 kg, VO2max of 67.0 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) had an average (mean ± SD) heart rate of 132 ± 9 bpm, oxygen consumption of 34.0 ± 6.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), RER of 0.91 ± 0.04, and VE of 86.0 ± 14.3 L·min(-1) during the 21.7 km measuring period. This represented an average of 51% VO2max and 75% heart rate maximum. Energy expenditure was 12.6 ± 2.5 kcals·min(-1), or 82.7 ± 16.6 kcals·km(-1) (134 ± 27 kcals·mile(-1)) at 68.3 ± 12.5% carbohydrate. Extrapolation of this data would result in an energy expenditure of >13,000 kcals for the 160 km race, and an exogenous carbohydrate requirement of >250 kcal·hr(-1). The energy cost of running for this subject on separate, noncompetitive occasions ranged from 64.9 ± 8.5 to 74.4 ± 5.5 kcals·km(-1) (105 ± 14 to 120 ± 9 kcals·mile(-1)). Ultradistance trail running increases energy expenditure above that of running on nonundulating terrain, which may result in underestimating energy requirements during these events and subsequent undernourishment and suboptimal performance. Key PointsThe energy cost of running is elevated during ultradistance trail races compared to normal running conditions.This elevated energy cost results in a ~12% increase in energy expenditure for a given distance.Ad libitum energy intake may grossly underestimate the demand of ultradistance running in the conditions investigated in this paper, thus jeopardizing race performance.

Keywords: Energy expenditure; caloric expenditure; running economy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
VO2 (ml·min-1, red trace, left y-axis) and HR (bpm, blue trace, right y-axis) during a 13.4 mile section of the Western States 100 ultradistance running race.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
VO2 (ml·min-1, red trace, left y-axis) and HR (bpm, blue trace, right y-axis) during a 4 mile run on a track.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Braun W.A., Dutto D.J. (2003) The effects of a single bout of downhill running and ensuing delayed onset of muscle soreness on running economy performed 48 h later. European Journal of Applied Physiology 90, 29-34 - PubMed
    1. Calbet J.A., Chavarren J., Dorado C. (2001) Running economy and delayed onset muscle soreness. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 41, 18-26 - PubMed
    1. Davies C.T., Thompson M.W. (1979a) Aerobic performance of female marathon and male ultramarathon athletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 41, 233-245 - PubMed
    1. Davies C.T., Thompson M.W. (1979b) Estimated aerobic performance and energy cost of severe exercise of 24 h duration. Ergonomics 22, 1249-1255 - PubMed
    1. Davies C.T., Thompson M.W. (1986) Physiological responses to prolonged exercise in ultramarathon athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology 61, 611-617 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources