Efficiency of non-ionic surfactants - EDTA for treating TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil
- PMID: 24359927
- PMCID: PMC3932998
- DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-11-41
Efficiency of non-ionic surfactants - EDTA for treating TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil
Erratum in
-
Correction: Efficiency of non-ionic surfactants - EDTA for treating TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil.J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014 Feb 24;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-47. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014. PMID: 24565510 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction of fuel hydrocarbons and inorganic compounds (heavy metals) into the soil, resulting in a change of the soil quality, which is likely to affect use of the soil or endangering public health and ground water. This study aimed to determine a series of parameters to remediation of TPH and heavy metals contaminated soil by non-ionic surfactants- chelating agents washing process. In this experimental study, the effects of soil washing time, agitation speed, concentration of surfactant, chelating agent and pH on the removal efficiency were studied. The results showed that TPH removal by nonionic surfactants (Tween 80, Brij 35) in optimal condition were 70-80% and 60-65%, respectively. Addition of chelating agent (EDTA) significantly increases Cd and Pb removal. The washing of soil by non- ionic surfactants and EDTA was effective in remediation of TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil, thus it can be recommended for remediation of contaminated soil.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils.J Hazard Mater. 1999 Apr 23;66(1-2):151-210. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00010-2. J Hazard Mater. 1999. PMID: 10379036 Review.
-
Heavy metal removal by GLDA washing: Optimization, redistribution, recycling, and changes in soil fertility.Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 1;569-570:557-568. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.155. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Sci Total Environ. 2016. PMID: 27371771
-
Simultaneous removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals from natural soil by combined non-ionic surfactants and EDTA as extracting reagents: Laboratory column tests.J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109258. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.029. Epub 2019 Jul 17. J Environ Manage. 2019. PMID: 31325789
-
Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation.J Hazard Mater. 2013 Sep 15;260:399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 13. J Hazard Mater. 2013. PMID: 23807474
-
Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review.J Hazard Mater. 2015 Mar 21;285:419-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 10. J Hazard Mater. 2015. PMID: 25528485 Review.
Cited by
-
Correction: Efficiency of non-ionic surfactants - EDTA for treating TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil.J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014 Feb 24;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-47. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014. PMID: 24565510 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Optimization of aeration enhanced surfactant soil washing for remediation of diesel-contaminated soils using response surface methodology.PeerJ. 2020 Feb 13;8:e8578. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8578. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32095374 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Solano-Serena F, Marchal R, Vandecasteele JP. Biodegradation of gasoline in the environment: from overall assessment to the case of recalcitrant hydrocarbons. Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole. 2001;11:479–498.
-
- ATSDR. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). US department of health and human services, public health service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts123.pdf. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources