Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Nov;18(8):1941-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1170-5. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

Platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of localized gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of localized gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial

Gülnihal Eren et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of localized gingival recessions.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients with localized gingival recession defects (Miller I, II) participated in this split-mouth trial. Forty-four defects received either CAF + PRF (test) or CAF with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (control). Gingival recession depth (RD), gingival recession width (RW), keratinized tissue width (KTW), recession area (RA), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival thickness (GT) were evaluated at baseline and 6 months. RD, RW, RA and KTW were calculated on standardized photographs with a computer image analysis program.

Results: Percentage of root coverage in test group was 92.7 % and in control group was 94.2 % (p > 0.05). Percentage of complete root coverage of the test and control groups was 72.7 and 77.3 %, respectively (p > 0.05). KTW and GT were increased in both groups from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that localized gingival recessions could be successfully treated with CAF + PRF as well as CAF + SCTG. The digital measuring method provided high accuracy and precision in the evaluation of treatment outcomes after both surgical procedures.

Clinical relevance: PRF might be suggested as an alternative to SCTG for the treatment of localized gingival recessions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jul;65:26-9 - PubMed
    1. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:97-120 - PubMed
    1. J Periodontol. 2006 Feb;77(2):195-202 - PubMed
    1. J Periodontol. 1992 Jun;63(6):554-60 - PubMed
    1. J Periodontol. 1998 Nov;69(11):1271-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources