Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 3:13:e050.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.1160. eCollection 2013.

A tool for assessing continuity of care across care levels: an extended psychometric validation of the CCAENA questionnaire

Affiliations

A tool for assessing continuity of care across care levels: an extended psychometric validation of the CCAENA questionnaire

Marta-Beatriz Aller et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Background: The CCAENA questionnaire was developed to assess care continuity across levels from the patients' perspective. The aim is to provide additional evidence on the psychometric properties of the scales of this questionnaire.

Methods: Cross-sectional study by means of a survey of a random sample of 1500 patients attended in primary and secondary care in three health care areas of the Catalan health care system. Data were collected in 2010 using the CCAENA questionnaire. To assess psychometric properties, an exploratory factor analysis was performed (construct validity) and the item-rest correlations and Cronbach's alpha were calculated (internal consistency). Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated (multidimensionality) and the ability to discriminate between groups was tested.

Results: The factor analysis resulted in 21 items grouped into three factors: patient-primary care provider relationship, patient-secondary care provider relationship and continuity across care levels. Cronbach's alpha indicated good internal consistency (0.97, 0.93, 0.80) and the correlation coefficients indicated that dimensions can be interpreted as separated scales. Scales discriminated patients according to health care area, age and educational level.

Conclusion: The CCAENA questionnaire has proved to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring patients' perceptions of continuity. Providers and researchers could apply the questionnaire to identify areas for health care improvement.

Keywords: continuity of patient care; delivery of health care; outcome and process assessment (health care); questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Policies Series . Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008.
    1. Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, Gibson TB, Marder WD, Weiss KB, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2007;22(Suppl 3):391–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid R, Haggerty J, McKendry R. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2002. Defusing the confusion: concepts and measures of continuity of healthcare.
    1. Haggerty J, Reid R, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal. 2003;327(7425):1219–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman G, Hughes J. Continuity of care and the patient experience. London: The King's Fund; 2010.

LinkOut - more resources