Pain during Removal of Carious Lesions in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- PMID: 24363672
- PMCID: PMC3865729
- DOI: 10.1155/2013/896381
Pain during Removal of Carious Lesions in Children: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess pain and the need for anesthesia during chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie gel and the traditional method (low-speed bur) in pediatric patients. A randomized, controlled, clinical trial with a "split-mouth" design was carried out involving 20 children (10 girls and 10 boys) aged four to seven years. Forty primary teeth (two per child) were randomly allocated to either Group 1 (G1: chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie gel) or Group 2 (G2: removal of carious dentin with low-speed bur). A face scale was used to classify the sensation of pain during the procedure (1: absence of pain; 2: mild pain; 3: moderate pain; 4: moderately intense pain; 5: intense pain; and 6: extremely intense pain). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (U) test. Pain scores were higher in G2, with statistically significant differences in comparison to G1 (U = 148.0; W = 358.0; P = 0.041). Chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie provides a lesser degree of pain in comparison to conventional caries removal and does not require the use of local anesthesia. The clinical trial registration number is NCT01811420.
References
-
- Balciuniene I, Sabalaite R, Juskiene I. Chemomechanical caries removal for children. Stomatologija. 2005;7(2):40–44. - PubMed
-
- Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005;30(2):115–119. - PubMed
-
- Kumar J, Nayak M, Prasad KL, Gupta N. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie—a papain gel. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2012;23(5):p. 697. - PubMed
-
- Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2010;14(3):233–240. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical