Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: a diagnostic test study from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) Study
- PMID: 24364894
- PMCID: PMC4110052
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.061
Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: a diagnostic test study from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) Study
Abstract
Background: Albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in spot urine samples is recommended for albuminuria screening instead of measured albumin excretion rate (mAER) in 24-hour urine collections. In patients with extremes of muscle mass, differences in spot urine creatinine values may lead to under- or overestimation of mAER by ACR. We hypothesized that calculating estimated AER (eAER) using spot ACR and estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) may improve albuminuria assessment.
Study design: Diagnostic test study.
Setting & participants: 2,711 community-living individuals from the general population of the Netherlands participating in the PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease) Study.
Index test: eAER was computed as the product of ACR and eCER. eCER was computed using 3 previously validated methods (Ix, Ellam, and Walser).
Reference test: mAER, based on two 24-hour urine collections. Accuracy of the eAER and ACR were defined as the percentage of participants falling within 30% (P30) of mAER.
Results: Mean age was 49 years, 46% were men, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and median mAER was 7.2 (IQR, 5.4-11.0) mg/d. Mean measured CER was 1,381 mg/d, and median ACR was 4.9 mg/g. Using the Ix equation, median eAER was 6.4 mg/d. In the full cohort, eAER was more accurate and less biased compared to ACR (P30, 48.9% vs 33.6%; bias, -34.2% vs -14.1%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, improvement was most notable in the middle and highest weight tertiles and in men. Using the other methods for eCER produced similar results.
Limitations: Little ethnic heterogeneity and a generally healthy cohort make extension of findings to other races and the chronically ill uncertain.
Conclusions: In a large community-dwelling cohort, eAER was more accurate than ACR in assessing albuminuria.
Keywords: Albuminuria; albumin-creatinine ratio; creatinine excretion.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Comment in
-
Albuminuria: time to focus on accuracy.Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):378-81. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.002. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014. PMID: 24560154 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hutchison AS, O’Reilly DS, MacCuish AC. Albumin excretion rate, albumin concentration, and albumin/creatinine ratio compared for screening diabetics for slight albuminuria. Clinical Chemistry. 1988;34:2019–2021. - PubMed
-
- Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC. Use of Protein:Creatinine Ratio Measurements on Random Urine Samples for Prediction of Significant Proteinuria: A Systematic Review. Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1577–1586. - PubMed
-
- Stevens PE, Levin A Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013;158:825–830. - PubMed
-
- Ellam TJ. Albumin:creatinine ratio--a flawed measure? The merits of estimated albuminuria reporting. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118:c324–c330. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
