Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;76(4):597-9.
doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0447. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Prevalence of duck circovirus infection of subclinical pekin ducks in South Korea

Affiliations

Prevalence of duck circovirus infection of subclinical pekin ducks in South Korea

Se-Yeoun Cha et al. J Vet Med Sci. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

An investigation was carried out to determine the prevalence and infection pattern of duck circovirus (DuCV) in subclinical Pekin ducks on South Korean duck farms. A total of 147 samples collected from 92 duck farms in five provinces were examined from 2011 to 2012. The overall prevalence of DuCV PCR-positive pooled bursa of Fabricius and liver samples was 21.8% (32/147). The prevalence of DuCV PCR-positive samples increased significantly in 3-week-old ducks compared with that in 1-week-old ducks (P<0.05). DuCV in association with Riemerella and Salmonella infections (10.9%; 16/147) occurred at the same level as infection with DuCV alone (10.9%; 16/147). In comparison of the relationship between bacterial diseases (salmonellosis, Riemerella infection) and morbidity in farms with and without DuCV, morbidity was higher in circovirus-positive farms (50%; 16/32) than in circovirus-negative farms (26.1%; 30/115). Our findings provide baseline information on the degree of DuCV infection and distribution and pattern of DuCV in ducks, and it is evident that DuCV can be associated with subclinical diseases and that subclinical infection could be economically important.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banda A., Galloway-Haskins R. I., Sandhu T. S., Schat K. A.2007. Genetic analysis of a duck circovirus detected in commercial Pekin ducks in New York. Avian Dis. 51: 90–95. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2007)051[0090:GAOADC]2.0.CO;2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen C. L., Wang P. X., Lee M. S., Shien J. H., Shieh H. K., Ou S. J., Chen C. H., Chang P. C.2006. Development of a polymerase chain reaction procedure for detection and differentiation of duck and goose circovirus. Avian Dis. 50: 92–95. doi: 10.1637/7435-090705R1.1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. FAO 2012. FaAO. FAOSTAT on download data in production of live animals (duck) in 2012 [cited 2012 August 7]. Available from http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html
    1. Fringuelli E., Scott A., Beckett A., McKillen J., Smyth J., Palya V., Glavits R., Ivanics E., Mankertz A., Franciosini M.2005. Diagnosis of duck circovirus infections by conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction tests. Avian Pathol. 34: 495–500. doi: 10.1080/03079450500368334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hattermann K., Schmitt C., Soike D., Mankertz A.2003. Cloning and sequencing of Duck circovirus (DuCV). Arch. Virol. 148: 2471–2480. doi: 10.1007/s00705-003-0181-y - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms