Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;38(7):1814-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2423-9.

The limited role of ultrasound in the diagnostic process of colonic diverticulitis

K Nielsen  1 , M C Richir, T T Stolk, T van der Ploeg, G R H M Moormann, B M Wiarda, W H Schreurs
Affiliations

The limited role of ultrasound in the diagnostic process of colonic diverticulitis

K Nielsen et al. World J Surg. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Diverticulitis is commonly diagnosed using ultrasound (US), followed by computed tomography (CT). Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of US compared with CT for patients with uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis.

Methods: We reviewed medical records of 232 patients admitted with diverticulitis via the emergency department between January 2009 and January 2011. Patients who had undergone US and a CT scan were identified and further analyzed.

Results: A total of 123 patients underwent an US and a CT scan. In 78/94 patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, results of US and CT scan were compatible (83 %); in 6 of the remaining 29 patients both modalities showed a complicated diverticulitis (21 %). US misdiagnosed 17 % of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis and 79 % with complicated diverticulitis.

Conclusions: US is insufficient for diagnosing a complicated diverticulitis. Missing a complicated diverticulitis can have important clinical implications, and if diverticulitis is suspected, we suggest obtaining a CT scan to confirm diagnosis and to exclude complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2498-511 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):271-5 - PubMed
    1. Ultraschall Med. 2004 Sep;25(5):342-7 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jun;170(6):1445-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 1998 May;39(3):315-21 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources