Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;23(5):1077-83.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3135-4. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

The odontoid process: various configuration types in MR examinations

Affiliations

The odontoid process: various configuration types in MR examinations

Evangelos Perdikakis et al. Eur Spine J. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Several developmental anomalies have been described with respect to the odontoid process. The purpose of the study was to describe the MR appearance of the odontoid process and to calculate the prevalence of its morphological variants.

Methods and materials: We retrospectively reviewed 133 patients (85 males and 48 females, age range of 19-81 years, mean 39.5), examined within a 7-year period. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≤30 and >30-year-old. The morphology of the odontoid process was classified into type I: pyramidal tip and type II: ovoid or convex tip. The incidence of os odontoideum and os terminale and the presence of longitudinal cleft were also recorded. Fischer's exact test was used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Results: Type I was identified in 54 cases (40.6 %) and type II in 79 cases (59.4 %). Os odontoideum was recorded in one case (0.7 %), os terminale in 24 cases (18 %) and the presence of a longitudinal cleft (partial or complete) in 86 cases (64.7 %). Type I showed a higher prevalence in the ≤30 age group (p < 0.05). No differences were shown between sexes.

Conclusion: The configuration types of odontoid process are reported herein. The clinical relevance of this morphological variation needs to be elucidated with further studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):271-5 - PubMed
    1. Skeletal Radiol. 2002 Nov;31(11):637-42 - PubMed
    1. Clin Anat. 2007 Nov;20(8):892-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Feb;84(2):277-88 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 1994 Mar;14(2):255-77 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources