Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug;21(4):861-83.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2.

Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis

Jared A Linck et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Although working memory (WM) figures centrally in many theories of second language (L2) proficiency development and processing, some have argued that the importance of WM is overstated (e.g., Juffs, Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199-225, 2004). Despite many studies over the past two decades, the literature lacks a quantitative synthesis of the extant results. In this article, we report a meta-analysis of data from 79 samples involving 3,707 participants providing 748 effect sizes. The results indicate that WM is positively associated with both L2 processing and proficiency outcomes, with an estimated population effect size (ρ) of .255. In additional analyses, we assessed whether the WM-criterion relationship was modulated by potential covariates identified in the literature search (i.e., participant characteristics, WM measure features, criterion measure factors, and publication status). The results of the covariate analyses indicated larger effect sizes for the executive control (vs. storage) component of WM, and for verbal (vs. nonverbal) measures of WM. Minimal publication bias was detected, suggesting that WM has a robust, positive relationship with L2 outcomes. We discuss the implications of these results for models of WM and theories of L2 processing and L2 proficiency development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 - PubMed
    1. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126 - PubMed
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 May;27(3):817-35 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):395-419 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources