Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e83694.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083694. eCollection 2013.

Estimates of marine debris accumulation on beaches are strongly affected by the temporal scale of sampling

Affiliations

Estimates of marine debris accumulation on beaches are strongly affected by the temporal scale of sampling

Stephen D A Smith et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Marine debris is a global issue with impacts on marine organisms, ecological processes, aesthetics and economies. Consequently, there is increasing interest in quantifying the scale of the problem. Accumulation rates of debris on beaches have been advocated as a useful proxy for at-sea debris loads. However, here we show that past studies may have vastly underestimated the quantity of available debris because sampling was too infrequent. Our study of debris on a small beach in eastern Australia indicates that estimated daily accumulation rates decrease rapidly with increasing intervals between surveys, and the quantity of available debris is underestimated by 50% after only 3 days and by an order of magnitude after 1 month. As few past studies report sampling frequencies of less than a month, estimates of the scale of the marine debris problem need to be critically re-examined and scaled-up accordingly. These results reinforce similar, recent work advocating daily sampling as a standard approach for accurate quantification of available debris in coastal habitats. We outline an alternative approach whereby site-specific accumulation models are generated to correct bias when daily sampling is impractical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of the study area showing Charlesworth Bay and the extent of the urbanised area of Coffs Harbour (shaded).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plot of estimated daily accumulation rate of marine debris against interval between sample periods (days) for Charlesworth Bay.
The regression is a power function with an r 2 of 0.872 and the following equation: estimated daily accumulation (y)  = 749.81interval(x) −0.67.

References

    1. Hong S, Lee J, Jang YC, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, et al. (2013) Impacts of marine debris on wild animals in the coastal area of Korea. Mar Pollut Bull 66: 117–124. - PubMed
    1. Moore E, Lyday S, Roletto J, Litle K, Parrish JK, et al. (2009) Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the north-west coast of the United States 2001–2005. Mar Pollut Bull 58: 1045–1051. - PubMed
    1. Gregory MR (2009) Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings-entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 364: 2013–2025. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore CJ, Moore SL, Leecaster MK, Weisberg SB (2001) A comparison of plastic and plankton in the North Pacific Central Gyre. Mar Pollut Bull 42: 1297–1300. - PubMed
    1. Martinez E, Maamaatuaiahutapu K, Taillandier V (2009) Floating marine debris surface drift: Convergence and accumulation toward the South Pacific subtropical gyre. Mar Pollut Bull 58: 1347–1355. - PubMed

Publication types