Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e84662.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084662. eCollection 2013.

Simulating my own or others action plans?--Motor representations, not visual representations are recalled in motor memory

Affiliations

Simulating my own or others action plans?--Motor representations, not visual representations are recalled in motor memory

Christian Seegelke et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Action plans are not generated from scratch for each movement, but features of recently generated plans are recalled for subsequent movements. This study investigated whether the observation of an action is sufficient to trigger plan recall processes. Participant dyads performed an object manipulation task in which one participant transported a plunger from an outer platform to a center platform of different heights (first move). Subsequently, either the same (intra-individual task condition) or the other participant (inter-individual task condition) returned the plunger to the outer platform (return moves). Grasp heights were inversely related to center target height and similar irrespective of direction (first vs. return move) and task condition (intra- vs. inter-individual). Moreover, participants' return move grasp heights were highly correlated with their own, but not with their partners' first move grasp heights. Our findings provide evidence that a simulated action plan resembles a plan of how the observer would execute that action (based on a motor representation) rather than a plan of the actually observed action (based on a visual representation).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup.
The participants shown here have given written informed consent, as outlined in the PLOS consent form, to publication of their photographs.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean grasp heights (relative to plunger base) as a function of center shelf height during the intra-individual task (triangles), inter-individual task (circles), and control task (squares) for the outer-to-center (panel A) and center-to-outer moves (panel B).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scatter plot comparing return move slopes of a given participant with first move slopes of the same participant (panel A) and with first move slopes of their partner (panel B) during the inter-individual task condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA (2004) Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res 157 (4): 486–495. PubMed: 15071711. - PubMed
    1. Hughes CML, Seegelke C, Schack T (2012) The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. J Mot Behav 44 (3): 195–201. doi:10.1080/00222895.2012.672483. PubMed: 22551086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. J Exp_Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33 (2): 425–441. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenbaum DA, Halloran ES, Cohen RG (2006) Grasping movement plans. Psychol Bull Rev 13 (5): 918–922. doi:10.3758/BF03194019. PubMed: 17328395. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenbaum DA, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Hum Mov_Sci 11: 61–69.

Publication types