Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 11;3(3):229-35.
eCollection 2013 Jul.

Tissue-engineered augmentation of a rotator cuff tendon using a reconstituted collagen scaffold: a histological evaluation in sheep

Affiliations

Tissue-engineered augmentation of a rotator cuff tendon using a reconstituted collagen scaffold: a histological evaluation in sheep

Craig Van Kampen et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. .

Abstract

To determine if an absorbable collagen scaffold of high porosity would allow rapid tissue in-growth and permit the functional maturation and alignment of tendon-like tissue, scaffolds were sutured to the superficial surface of the infraspinatus tendons of adult sheep. Histology demonstrated complete ingrowth with fibrovascular tissue by 6 weeks and by 12 weeks the scaffold had induced the formation of a layer of dense, regularly-oriented collagenous tissue which significantly increased the thickness of the native tendon. This new tissue was well-integrated into the host tissues at both the bone interface and along the length of the tendon. At 26 weeks the scaffold was completely absorbed leaving a stable layer of mature tendon-like tissue over the surface of the host tendon which was still present at 52 weeks. The use of a reconstituted collagen scaffold consistently increased the thickness of a rotator cuff tendon by inducing the formation of a well-integrated and mature tendon-like tissue.

Keywords: collagen scaffold; histology; rotator cuff; sheep; tendon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Scanning electron micrograph of the cross-section of a cryofractured reconstituted collagen scaffold. Bar=500 microns, original magnification=50×. (B) Histological section of the collagen scaffold prior to implantation. H&E, original magnification=50×. (C) Photograph of the collagen scaffold prior to implantation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Operative view of the reconstituted collagen scaffold sutured to the superior surface of the infraspinatus tendon. Scaffold size=15×30 mm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
At 6 weeks after implantation the porosity of the collagen scaffold (CS) was fully ingrown with new fibrovascular tissue (fibroblasts, blood vessels, and matrix). NT=New Tissue. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=100×.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
New tissue induced by the collagen scaffold at 12 weeks after implantation. (A) Gross photograph of the new tissue (NT) on top of the tendon (T). The squares indicate areas that are shown histologically in Panels B, C, and D. (B) Regularly-oriented collagen fibers in the area of the square on the left in Panel A. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=100×. (C) Interface between the new tissue (NT) and the tendon (T) in the area of the square on the right in Panel A showing continuity of collagen fibers between the new tissue and the underlying tendon. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=100×. (D) Polarized light image of Panel C.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Interface of the new tissue with bone at 12 weeks after implantation. (A) Integration of the new tissue (NT) into the native bone (NB). No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=100×. (B) Polarized light image of Panel A. Arrows indicate Sharpey’s fibers at the interface of the new tissue with the native bone.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
At 26 weeks after implantation the new tissue consisted of well-organized connective tissue. The collagen scaffold was completely absorbed by 26 weeks. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=50×.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
(A) At 26 weeks after implantation the new tissue (NT) was well-integrated with the native bone (NB) with a layer of fibrocartilage (FC) at the bone interface. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=50×. (B) Polarized light image of Panel A.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
At 52 weeks after implantation the new tissue consisted of well-organized connective tissue that was well-integrated with the underlying tendon. No inflammatory or foreign body reaction. H&E, original magnification=100×.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finnan RP, Crosby LA. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:609–616. - PubMed
    1. Gartsman GM, Milne JC. Articular surface partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:409–415. - PubMed
    1. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:10–15. - PubMed
    1. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Repair of partial tears of the rotator cuff. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2011;19:401–408. - PubMed
    1. Wang AW, Bauer S, Goonatillake M, Breidahl W, Zheng MH. Autologous tenocyte implantation, a novel treatment for partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and tendinopathy in an elite athlete. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Jan 11; doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007899. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources