Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;46(6):391-401.
doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2013.46.6.391. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

Pediatric mechanical circulatory support

Affiliations
Review

Pediatric mechanical circulatory support

Ivan Wilmot et al. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in the pediatric heart failure population has a limited history especially for infants, and neonates. It has been increasingly recognized that there is a rapidly expanding population of children diagnosed and living with heart failure. This expanding population has resulted in increasing numbers of children with medically resistant end-stage heart failure. The traditional therapy for these children has been heart transplantation. However, children with heart failure unlike adults do not have symptoms until they present with end-stage heart failure and therefore, cannot safely wait for transplantation. Many of these children were bridged to heart transplantation utilizing extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to transplant which has yielded poor results. As such, industry, clinicians, and the government have refocused interest in developing increasing numbers of MCS options for children living with heart failure as a bridge to transplantation and as a chronic therapy. In this review, we discuss MCS options for short and long-term support that are currently available for infants and children with end-stage heart failure.

Keywords: Cardiac transplantation; Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation; Heart failure; Pediatric; Ventricular assist device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protocol for device selection; name of the devices used in the figure are authors' preference for each device type.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) RotaFlow: pump head and drive unit (Courtesy of MAQUET Cardiovascular). (B) Thoratec PediMag: pump (Courtesy of Thoratec Co.). (C) Tandem Heart: pump (Courtesy of Cardiac Assist Inc.).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Berlin Heart EXCOR pump (Courtesy of Berlin Heart Inc.). (B) Thoratec IVAD/PVAD (Courtesy of Thoratec Co.). (C) TAH (Courtesy of SynCardia Systems Inc.). (D) HeartWare HVAD (Courtesy of HeartWare Systems). (E) Thoratec HeartMate II (Courtesy of Thoratec Co.).

References

    1. Rossano JW, Zafar F, Graves DE, et al. Prevalence of heart failure related hospitalizations and risk factors for mortality in pediatric patients: an analysis of a nationwide sampling of hospital discharges. Circulation. 2009;120:S586.
    1. Jeewa A, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell G, Humpl T, Dipchand AI. Outcomes with ventricular assist device versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to pediatric heart transplantation. Artif Organs. 2010;34:1087–1091. - PubMed
    1. Morales DL, Adachi I, Heinle JS, Fraser CD., Jr A new era: use of an intracorporeal systemic ventricular assist device to support a patient with a failing Fontan circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:e138–e140. - PubMed
    1. Morales DL, Khan MS, Gottlieb EA, Krishnamurthy R, Dreyer WJ, Adachi I. Implantation of total artificial heart in congenital heart disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;24:142–143. - PubMed
    1. Helman DN, Addonizio LJ, Morales DL, et al. Implantable left ventricular assist devices can successfully bridge adolescent patients to transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19:121–126. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources