Two-stage revision using a modified articulating spacer in infected total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 24368995
- PMCID: PMC3867610
- DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.180
Two-stage revision using a modified articulating spacer in infected total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate clinical results of two-stage revision using a modified articulating spacer for treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 20 cases treated by two-stage revision arthroplasty using a modified articulating spacer under the diagnosis of infected TKA from January 2006 to December 2011. The mean follow-up period was 22.3 months. The first operation consisted of debridement after removal of the prosthesis, reinsertion of the femoral component after autoclaving, and implantation of antibiotic-loaded cement with a new polyethylene in the proximal tibia.
Results: The mean period between the primary TKA and the first stage operation was 39 months and between the first stage operation and the revision arthroplasty was 3.3 months. The average range of motion (ROM) increased from 69.8° preoperatively to 102.8° postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean Knee Society knee score increased from 33.8 points to 85.3 points (p<0.001). The mean Knee Society function score increased from 35 points to 87.5 points (p<0.001). The mean Hospital for Special Surgery score increased from 57.6 points preoperatively to 82.6 points postoperatively (p<0.001). Two cases (10%) were re-infected after the revision arthroplasty.
Conclusions: Two-stage revision arthroplasty using an articulating cement spacer can be an effective therapy not only for the treatment of an infected TKA but also for recovery of knee ROM and function.
Keywords: Infection; Knee; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Two-stage.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Borden LS, Gearen PF. Infected total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for management. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:27–36. - PubMed
-
- Fehring TK, Odum S, Calton TF, Mason JB. Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;(380):9–16. - PubMed
-
- Bae DK, Yim C. Role of articulating spacer in two stage reimplantation of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Knee Soc. 1998;10:154–160.
-
- Meek RM, Masri BA, Dunlop D, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, McGraw R, Duncan CP. Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1888–1892. - PubMed
-
- Haddad FS, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP, Duncan CP. The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:807–812. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources