Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan-Feb;16(1):81-8.
doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122342.

Male-mediated developmental toxicity

Affiliations
Review

Male-mediated developmental toxicity

Diana Anderson et al. Asian J Androl. 2014 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Male-mediated developmental toxicity has been of concern for many years. The public became aware of male-mediated developmental toxicity in the early 1990s when it was reported that men working at Sellafield might be causing leukemia in their children. Human and animal studies have contributed to our current understanding of male-mediated effects. Animal studies in the 1980s and 1990s suggested that genetic damage after radiation and chemical exposure might be transmitted to offspring. With the increasing understanding that there is histone retention and modification, protamine incorporation into the chromatin and DNA methylation in mature sperm and that spermatozoal RNA transcripts can play important roles in the epigenetic state of sperm, heritable studies began to be viewed differently. Recent reports using molecular approaches have demonstrated that DNA damage can be transmitted to babies from smoking fathers, and expanded simple tandem repeats minisatellite mutations were found in the germline of fathers who were exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster. In epidemiological studies, it is possible to clarify whether damage is transmitted to the sons after exposure of the fathers. Paternally transmitted damage to the offspring is now recognized as a complex issue with genetic as well as epigenetic components.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Miller D, Brinkworth M, Iles D. Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction. 2010;139:287–301. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins TG, Carrell DT. The sperm epigenome and potential implications for the developing embryo. Reproduction. 2012;143:727–34. - PubMed
    1. Keightley PD. Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics. 2012;190:295–304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488:471–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laubenthal J, Zlobinskaya O, Poterlowicz K, Baumgartner A, Gdula MR, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced transgenerational alterations in genome stability in cord blood of human F1 offspring. FASEB J. 2012;26:3946–56. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts